A former councillor from Slough has effectively resigned from the Labour Party after failing to persuade his MP, (now a candidate seeking re-election), to support the introduction of a new UK blasphemy law.
Mohammed Arif, who was a councillor in
the 1990s, was unhappy with Fiona Mactaggart's refusal to publicly back the Blasphemy Law which limits the freedom of expression relating to blasphemy. He said:
I am not happy about resigning but I had no choice, I am
not being listened to. She is not listening to us. This has really hurt me.
Arif is the president of the Pakistan Welfare Association (PWA). He wrote to Ms Mactaggart in February, on behalf of the PWA, and asked her to back a
Parliamentary bill which would support such a law. He received a response from Mactaggart in April in which she said she would pass a petition on to the correct government minister if the feelings were widespread across Slough. He complained:
I have no difficulty with the Labour Party itself. It is the people who run the local party, they do not bother to listen.
I am not against freedom of expression, everybody has the right to their
own views... HOWEVER ...respect is more important.
Arif has now pledged support to the Conservative parliamentary candidate, Gurcharan Singh and says he is in favour of David Cameron's commitment to tackling Islamophobia
.
Update: Post-election update
16th May 2015. See article from
secularism.org.uk
The Labour MP for Slough has hit out against voter intimidation, after some Muslim voters were told that they were not true Muslims unless they voted against her.
The row centres over a local campaign for a blasphemy law. During the General
Election campaign newly re-elected MP Fiona Mactaggart apparently resisted calls for the draconian measure, and when the result was announced she issued a stark warning about spiritual coercion in one community - in an apparent reference to
Muslims in Slough.
Mactaggart said voters had been intimidated and that she wouldn't build bridges with those behind the smears:
I don't see how you can build a bridge with someone who says 'you aren't a
proper Muslim if you vote for Fiona.
There has been an element of spiritual coercion in one community which I profoundly regret. I think it was an attempt to divide Slough and its community which is dangerous. It is religious
intimidation.
Her defeated Conservative Party rival, Gurcharan Singh, said :
The truth is that Fiona refused to listen to the concerns of Slough's Muslim community and the Pakistan Welfare
Association about the need for action to provide a legal channel to respond to those blaspheming against their religion.
Worryingly, Singh said the local campaign for a blasphemy law resonated with Sikhs and Hindus too.
Stephen Evans of the National Secular Society said:
The recent election campaign saw numerous attempts to exert religious or spiritual influence over voters. There may well be problems with how the law deals with this kind of action by religious groups and leaders, as
some argue. Either way, it is an extremely troubling development. We do not want to see sectarian politics emerging in this country.
As for Mr Singh- it is deeply concerning to hear a parliamentary candidate supporting a campaign
for a blasphemy law. Inter-faith support for such a regressive measure is nothing to be proud of.