|
|
|
|
| 17th September
2015
|
|
|
Tim Black reckons preachers don't need the state's seal of approval See article from spiked-online.com
|
|
|
|
|
| 4th September 2015
|
|
|
Radicalisation play cancelled by theatre after concerns about 'extremist agenda' See article from
theguardian.com |
|
|
|
|
| 2nd September 2015
|
|
|
The UK government should look to what is happening to free expression in Egypt and Turkey before broadening terrorist laws to include those who spread hate. By Jodie Ginsberg See
article from opendemocracy.net |
|
Followers of Indian religion to protest against dance drama at Birmingham arts centre
|
|
|
| 26th August 2015
|
|
| See article from
birminghammail.co.uk See agore's Dance Drama: Valmiki Pratibha from
macbirmingham.co.uk |
Followers of an ancient Indian religion are to gather outside a Birmingham theatre to protest over a play that depicts their guru as a villain. Members of the Central Valmiki Sabha International organisation are 'outraged' that the production -
Tagore's Dance Drama: Valmiki Pratibha - shows the group's guru, Bhagwan Valmiki GI, as a robber, looter and killer. Worshippers from across the UK will demonstrate outside the Mac arts centre in Edgbaston on Sunday, the day the play is due
to be performed. Representatives of other faiths, including Sikhs and Christians, are also expected to join the protest. Jagdish Rai, general secretary of Central Valmiki Sabha UK, said: There is a great deal of
upset within our community. There has never been any evidence to suggest that our guru was a thief, he came from royalty. We will not have this and this is why we are planning this protest. There are people from all faiths
attending because they want to support our cause. If someone was saying something against their faith, they would feel the same. This will be a peaceful protest. We are not interested in violence, we just want to get our message
across. There will be a lot of people there because there is a great strength of feeling about this. We are fine for the play to go ahead, but we want them to eliminate the part where they depict the person we worship as a thief
and a thug because we do not believe this to be the case.
The play is being performed by Nrityakunj, a South Asian dance, drama and arts company based in Manchester, and choreographed by artistic director Mitali Dev. It has already
been staged in London, Manchester and Liverpool. |
|
Mohammed cartoon event in London has been cancelled
|
|
|
| 19th August 2015
|
|
| See article from freethinker.co.uk |
Anne Marie Walters has announced that the Mohammed cartoon exhibition that she and others had planned for September in London has been cancelled. She explained: Over the last few weeks, I have had several conversations
with both Scotland Yard and counter-terror detectives. My conclusion? That the risk of running this exhibition is simply too high. When setting out to do something like this, one has to be prepared for the possibility of threats, or even violence, but
it's easy to underestimate the impact such things will have on the people around you. There's a very real possibility that people could be hurt or killed, before, during, and after the event. This, together with the fact that our
venue had indicated it wanted to pull out citing security and insurance concerns, and given the fear that people were feeling generally, the only responsible thing to do was to pull back and try to learn some lessons.
|
|
A National Youth Theatre production about jihadi brides has been abruptly cancelled
|
|
|
| 5th August 2015
|
|
| See article from
theguardian.com See also Index
calls for transparency on Homegrown cancellation from indexoncensorship.org |
A play exploring the motives behind radicalised young people joining Islamic State has been cancelled less than a fortnight before its opening night, with the creators claiming the voices of the young cast have been silenced . Homegrown , a National Youth Theatre (NYT) production, was closed down with the creators saying they were given no prior warning. Director Nadia Latif and playwright Omar El-Khairy believe the production was cancelled due to external pressures, claiming both local authorities and police got involved during the development of the play. Latif said:
There was no warning. We got an email on Thursday night saying the show was cancelled, rehearsals are done, and the cast were told on Friday morning. And that was really a sucker punch, not least because we didn't see
it coming at all. There must have been some extraordinary external pressure to cancel the production to justify that emotional trauma on a cast of 112 young people.
The play had a cast of 112 people aged between 15 and 25 who were
mostly from ethnic minorities. It was originally due to take place in a school in Bethnal Green linked to the case of schoolgirls Shamima Begum, Kadiza Sultana and Amira Abase who travelled to Syria to become jihadi brides. The play looked at this
emotive issues of jihadi brides and attitudes towards Islam in the UK. |
|
Northern Ireland's PPS explains the prosecution of a preacher for criticising islam
|
|
|
| 1st August 2015
|
|
| See
article from
secularism.org.uk |
The Public Prosecution Service (PPS) of Northern Ireland have defended their prosecution of James McConnell, the Christian preacher who called Islam Satanic. In a letter sent to the National Secular Society, the PPS have
doubled-down on their decision to take the case to trial, after the NSS warned that their actions had created a chilling effect on free speech. A Christian organisation warned that many churches will be wary of what they place on the internet
until this case is heard and the law is clarified. Pastor McConnell is being prosecuted under the Communications Act 2003 for sending a grossly offensive message. The Pastor said during a sermon that Islam was a doctrine spawned in hell
and that while there may be good Muslims in the UK, he didn't trust Muslims generally. In response to a letter of concern written by the National Secular Society urging the PPS to reconsider its course of action,
the Prosecution Service have claimed that their controversial decision is in the public interest , and have vowed to press on despite a raft of criticism from Christian groups, the National Secular Society and an imam, Dr Muhammad Al-Hussaini, who
said he strongly upholds the moral right of Pastor McConnell and myself, as Christian and Muslim, to disagree about matters of doctrine and belief. The PPS added in their response to the National Secular Society that they
had balanced the relevant public interest considerations in their treatment of the case, but that due to the gravity of the preacher's sermon and the circumstances of the offence and the offender they were right to deal with the
matter by way of an informed warning. Pastor McConnell rejected this warning, which would have remained on his criminal record for 12 months, and this led to the case proceeding to trial at the PPS's insistence.
Extraordinarily, the complaint about McConnell's sermon reportedly came from Dr Raied Al-Wazzan, who recently praised the Islamic State and said that Mosul had become the most peaceful city in the world under IS rule. You
can go from east to west of the city without fear, he claimed. Al-Wazzan is now described as the main prosecution witness in the case against McConnell. There has been widespread condemnation of the PPS's actions, but
Assistant Director Michael Agnew wrote that he remained of the view that the evidence Test for Prosecution is met and that a prosecution was justified given that McConnell has refused to accept the warning. NSS campaigns
manager Stephen Evans said: This baffling decision to persist with the prosecution of Pastor McConnell represents a reckless and grievous encroachment upon his - and everybody else's - fundamental right to free
expression. In our view Pastor McConnell was well within his rights to refuse a warning that would have remained on his criminal record for a year, particularly given that he clearly did not incite violence in his sermon and the
PPS do not even appear to claim that he did. Given that, the PPS's behaviour seems even more extraordinary. Whatever the outcome of this case, the actions of the Public Prosecution Service are likely to have a chilling effect on
everyone's freedom to speak openly about their beliefs. In an open and free society, we should all feel able to express our beliefs and opinions without fear of criminal sanction - regardless of how unpalatable others may find
them. The weapon of 'offense' is increasingly being used to stifle free expression. The desire to live in a harmonious and tolerant society is a noble one, but will not be achieved by the suppression of fundamental freedoms.
We again urge the PPS to drop this case and issue a full apology to Mr. McConnell.
|
|
MPs call for the censorship of a website reporting on muslim extremism and promoting an incendiary exhibition of cartoons
|
|
|
| 28th July 2015
|
|
| See
article from
theguardian.com |
A group of MPs have called for an investigation into a well known blog, reporting on muslim extremism, that is popular with the far right. The Gates of Vienna website has also been promoting an upcoming exhibition of cartoons of the religious
character Muhammad in London. It has been organised by the former Ukip parliamentary candidate Anne-Marie Waters and is set to take place at a location in central London on 18 September. The Labour MPs Ian Austin, Ruth Smeeth, Imran Hussain, Paula
Sherriff, Wes Streeting and John Cryer have written to the director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, asking her to consider if the site's owners are breaching the law. The letter reads: It is clear that these
are the ideas that inspired Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik and as such it is deeply troubling that they are available to inspire others. We would urge you to investigate the Gates of Vienna website and take appropriate action if anyone involved
is deemed to be promoting terrorism and civil disorder.
Austin told the Guardian that the exhibition of Muhammad cartoons was: Clearly [intended] to provoke a reaction from British Muslims and we
must all ensure this does not happen.
A spokesman for the Metropolitan police said an appropriate policing plan would be put in place for the event but would not comment further. |
|
Ofcom boss speaks to parliamentary committee about censorship of the BBC and also of religious hate channels
|
|
|
| 22nd July 2015
|
|
| See article from
theguardian.com See article from
theguardian.com |
Ofcom chief executive Sharon White was called to address the parliamentary culture, media and sport select committee. During the course of the session White told the MPs that she is paid £275,000 a year. She seemed keen on expanding Ofcom's remit to
take on the censorship portion of the BBC Trust's current role. She did however baulk at the suggestion to take on wider governance of the BBC. White said Ofcom already regulated various aspects of the BBC's output, including issues around decency
and harm and offence, and said if the government wanted it to extend its responsibilities to bias and impartiality we will do the best possible job . But she also warned there would be resourcing implications for the censor, which deals
with around 25,000 complaints a year, a tenth of the 250,000 complaints that are received by the BBC on an annual basis. White was quick to belittle a further option that another body entirely should pick up the BBC censorship role. White warned
that concern should be taken that a new OfBeeb-style body did not clash or cause confusion with the role of Ofcom. But she laughed off suggestions of a looming turf war . On the topic of extremist religious broadcasting, White said that
Ofcom has not been hampered by lack of legislation in cracking down on extremist broadcasts following David Cameron said it should be given beefed-up powers to tackle the issue. This was identified as one of the key pillars of Cameron's five-year counter
extremism strategy unveiled on Monday, in which he said Ofcom would be given new powers to take action against foreign channels that broadcast hate preachers. White told MPs on the House of Commons culture, media and sport select committee:
We haven't found that we have been unable to act because the legislation hasn't given us the powers. Where do you place cause and effect, between television and content being a powerful influencer,
and that reflecting growing views in society? It's a very difficult judgment to make ... One suspects that it will vary by community, even by family.
She said Ofcom had a very good monitoring department that looked at
potentially extremist content but added: Depending on the detail of the prime minister's statement and how that gets reflected in legislation ... we would need to look at the team and whether it would need some extra
resourcing. Ofcom shares the government's concerns about harmful, extremist content, and we have taken action against a number of channels. We are continuing to work closely with the government to ensure audiences remain
protected.
But she said the regulator's remit with regard to the internet was rather limited, to the broadcasting of stuff that looks like it's been on the television, in the terrible jargon, TV-like content . Ofcom's remit
does not cover content on the open internet. |
|
Christian moralists commission propaganda survey in support of Elspeth Howe's annual attempt to enact her Online Safety Bill, requiring age verification for adult content on the internet
|
|
|
| 17th July 2015
|
|
| See article from telegraph.co.uk See
Online Saftety Bill from
publications.parliament.uk |
Nearly three-quarters of people questioned for a survey for a christian morality campaign said all websites offering adult movies and pornography should introduce age-verification systems The Government should impose age verification checks on all
websites which offer pornography and 18-rated entertainment such as horror films , Fifty Shades of Grey and Game of Thrones , according to the survey. The survey of more than 2,000 adults was conducted earlier this month for
Christian Action Research and Education (CARE), which is campaigning for internet censorship. The ComRes survey found 74% of the people they asked said the Government should require sites offering pornography in the UK to put age verification
checks in place. A further 73% also said that age verification should apply to 18 rated films streamed online. The timing of publication of the survey was timed to support Elspeth Howe's latest Online Safety Bill, which was debated in the House of
Lords today. The Online Safety Bill required default website blocking for mobile phones, requires
strict ID verification for adult internet video and also required foreign porn sites to get a UK licence for its operation on threat of banks denying payment services for unlicensed websites. The Bill passed its 2nd reading in the Lords and now
moved to committee. But the government did rather point out that Howe was stepping on their toes for initiatives that the government would be introducing in the near future. |
|
UK group announces a London exhibition of Mohammed cartoons
|
|
|
| 2nd July 2015
|
|
| See
article from
independent.co.uk |
Campaign group, Sharia Watch UK, has announced plans to put on a London exhibition of cartoons depicting the religious character Mohamed. The groups says it will open in September 2015, and will feature Dutch politician Geert Wilders as a guest speaker.
The exhibition will consist of cartoons of Mohamed, which are being submitted by artists and supporters to Vive Charlie, an online satirical magazine which was set up in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo shootings. Anne Marie Waters,
director of Sharia Watch, said the aim is not to offend people , but added that people taking offence would not discourage them from holding the exhibition. As well as her role as Director of Sharia Watch, Waters is a UKIP activist. Waters said
that hundreds of cartoons have already been submitted to Vive Charlie, some of which will be shown at the exhibition. The exhibition is set to take place at a venue that is being kept secret by Sharia Watch, and is reminiscent of the similar event
in Texas that took place in May, which resulted in two Isis-inspired gunmen, Elton Simpson and Nadir Hamid Soofi, opening fire on the building where the exhibition was taking place. The Metropolitan Police said they had no knowledge of the planned
exhibition, and so could not say whether they plan to put any security measures in place at the venue. They added that they may issue a statement on the exhibition closer to the opening time. |
|
|