Three posters for Pulse & Cocktails sex shops:
a. A large poster sited on a road in Hitchin, Hertfordshire, seen in September 2011, stated in large text SEXy ADULT STORE . An image next to the text showed a woman in a
bunny girl outfit, posing with her finger to her open lips.
b. A large poster, which replaced ad (a) sited on a road in Hitchin, Hertfordshire, seen in October 2011, stated in large text SEXy ADULT STORE . An image
next to the text showed a woman dressed in a French maid's outfit, holding a feather duster.
c. A large poster sited on a dual carriageway in Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, seen in October 2011, stated in large text SEXY SUPERSTORE
. An image next to the text showed a woman dressed in a French maid's outfit, holding a feather duster.
Issues:
A member of the public and a local councillor challenged whether ad (a) was unsuitable to be seen by children.
The local councillor also challenged whether ad (a) was offensive.
-
A member of the public challenged whether ad (b) was offensive and unsuitable to be seen by children.
Two members of the public, who considered ad (c) was demeaning to women, challenged whether it was
offensive and unsuitable to be seen by children.
Cocktails Ltd said that all their advertising was done in-house and they had used various forms of media including radio, press and billboard since starting the business in 1997. This advertising had always followed a similar format,
promoting a sexy shopping theme, including their company name Pulse & Cocktails and also wording used on the store signage to describe the store as either a Sexy Superstore or a Sexy Adult Store instead of the traditional
Sex Shop . They said they had always used the word sexy to describe their stores as it was less harsh than the word sex .
They said that the images used on their posters and in the press were of models dressed
in fancy dress costume and these varied slightly, depending on the season and had ranged from a Bunny Girl costume, Miss Santa, a Sexy Maid and a Cow Girl. These costumes were not skimpy and were now so mainstream that they could be purchased from
general, high street clothing stores and supermarkets. The images used in their advertising were direct from the costume manufacturers and in addition to the advertising, the costumes and images were displayed on their store windows and mannequins.
Cocktails Ltd said that their posters were intended to have a sexier edge because they were advertising their business but they were not intended to be offensive, demeaning to women or overtly sexual , so as to be harmful to
children.
Cocktails Ltd stated that they selected the sites for the posters based on proximity to local stores and had not taken into consideration whether or not they were likely to be seen by children. Cocktails Ltd finished by
saying that they had seven billboard campaigns at sites in Leeds, Hitchin, Cheltenham, Stoke-on-Trent, Newcastle and Gloucester, which were all within close proximity to one of their stores. These sites had run continuously for several years and had been
chosen specifically because of their locations. They said that they did not run generic billboard campaigns randomly throughout the country and the posters advertised specific stores and were purely used for directional purposes to guide customers
travelling by car, on to the correct road. '
ASA Assessment: 1, 2, 3 & 4 Not upheld
The ASA noted the complainants' concerns and we considered that the images on each poster were mildly sexual. We
also noted that the text on posters (a) and (b) highlighted the letters SEX in the word SEXy and taking into account the service advertised on each of the posters along with the text and the images, we considered that the main message of
the posters was of a sexual nature. However, we considered that the posters were not overtly sexual and were therefore suitable for outdoor advertising.
We did, however, consider that because the posters were of a sexual nature
they were unsuitable to be seen by children and should be subject to a placement restriction and should therefore not appear within 100m of schools. In the case of each poster, we noted that this was already the case.
We
investigated the posters under CAP Code rules 1.3 (Social responsibility) and 4.1 (Harm and offence) but did not find them in breach. Action