A nightclub in Watford won permission to offer customers striptease and lap dancing, despite the council's nutter aspirations to create a family friendly town centre.
Members of Watford Borough Council said the decision to grant
Vogue permission to host adult entertainment felt like wearing handcuffs, tied by the Licensing Act 2003.
Under the law, applications can only be rejected if they are judged to be in violation of four licensing objectives. These are
the prevention of crime and disorder, public safety, the prevention of public nuisance and the protection of children from harm.
Speaking against the application, Neil Fitton, of Elm Court, whimpered: Because of the large number of people who
already visit Watford to various other establishments, I think this will cause additional visitors in an overcrowded area where it could give rise to alcohol-related violence. Due to the nature of activities, it could also give rise to intimidation and
harassment of other females that are out in town.
However, Julian Skeens, representing Opal Leisure and Neil Campbell, owner of Vogue, offered to reduce the venue's maximum capacity to 150 people from 240, and said it would not be a place
where people get drunk , referring to its minimum pricing policy for alcohol, where a beer costs £4.
Skeens revealed that at the venue, all patrons will be seated at all times, with waiter service at the bar. There will also be private
dancing booths and a VIP area with a dancing pole, alongside the main stage.
Conditions were imposed on the licence. These include those contained in the premises' operating schedule; a code of conduct for dancers drawn up by the venue; that the
licensee shall not allow distribution of flyers containing photos or other images which suggest that strip tease or similar entertainment takes place on the premises and which may be offensive; and the maximum capacity of the premises shall be limited to
150 whilst adult dancing is taking place.
|