|
Hotelier discriminating against gays found to be discriminating against gays by a court
|
|
|
| 19th October 2012
|
|
| See article from
christiantoday.com
|
A Christian B&B owner has been told to pay £ 3,600 in damages to a gay couple who were refused a double bed. Susanne Wilkinson said she was trying to uphold her beliefs about marriage at the Swiss Bed and
Breakfast in Cookham, Berkshire. At a court hearing this week, the judge accepted the sincerity of her Christian beliefs and that she had also refused to allow unmarried heterosexual couples from sharing a double bed. However, the judge
ruled that the policy broke equality laws by discriminating against Michael Black and John Morgan. She was ordered to pay damages on the grounds of hurt feelings to the couple. Wilkinson's legal defence was paid for by The Christian Institute.
Spokesman Mike Judge said, rather admitting that such discrimination is against the law: Yes, Mrs Wilkinson's B&B is a business, but it's also a family home. The law should be more flexible in allowing people to
live according to their own values under the own roof. A bit more balance is needed, rather than allowing one set of rights to automatically suppress another.
|
|
Hoteliers to contest fine for gay discrimination in Supreme Court
|
|
|
|
16th August 2012
|
|
| See article
from christianconcern.com
|
A Christian couple who were fined because of their discriminatory policy for double rooms at their guest house in Cornwall have won permission to take their case to the Supreme Court. Earlier this year the Court of Appeal upheld the verdict that
Peter and Hazelmary Bull had breached equality legislation and discriminated against Martyn Hall and his civil partner Steven Preddy after refusing them a double room citing their marrieds only policy for double rooms. The Bulls denied that
they had discriminated against the couple, saying that they had also barred unmarried heterosexual couples from sharing double rooms since they opened for business 25 years ago. Simon Calvert, of the Christian Institute, which funded the Bull's
appeal, said: Not everyone will agree with Peter and Hazelmary's beliefs, but a lot of people will think it is shame that the law doesn't let them live and work according to their own values under their own roof.
Something has gone badly wrong with our equality laws when good, decent people like Peter and Hazelmary are penalised but extremist hate preachers are protected.
|
12th February 2012 | | | Christian street preacher cleared of causing harassment, alarm or distress over comments about
gays being sinners
| The police always seem to side with the complainers, overreact, and never consider the other side of the argument nor the basic
principles of free speech See article from
christiantoday.com
|
A Christian street preacher has been cleared of hate crime charges over comments he made about homosexuality. Mike Overd was arrested last year under the Public Order Act for saying that gay men could be forgiven by God for their sin. The
charge was brought against him following a complaint by civil partners Craig Nichol and Craig Manning, who were walking by arm in arm as Overd preached on Taunton High Street. They felt that the preacher had singled them out as sinners and
complained to police, who arrested Overd and charged him with a hate crime. Overd was acquitted after the Magistrates concluded that he had not intended to cause harassment, alarm or distress. Overd said his case should never have been
brought before the court.
|
10th February 2012 | | | Christian hoteliers lose their legal case to be allowed to
discriminate against gay guests
| It must be incredibly expensive for Christians to keep on fighting this losing battle. The law simply does not allow
people to discriminate against gays. There simply is no exception for christians, much as they would like one. Would it be to much for Christians to accept that they should love their neighbours even if they are gay. After all that's what the
great man said. See article from stonewall.org.uk
|
Stonewall today welcomed a decision by the Court of Appeal to uphold a landmark court ruling in favour of a couple refused a hotel room by the owners of a hotel in Cornwall. Civil Partners Martyn Hall and Steven Preddy had been turned away from
the Chymorvah Hotel near Penzance in 2010 by owners Peter and Hazelmary Bull. In January 2011 a judge at Bristol County Court ruled that the Bulls' behaviour amounted to direct discrimination, and awarded a total of £ 3,600 damages to Mr Hall and Mr Preddy.
Ben Summerskill, Stonewall Chief Executive, said: We're delighted that the Court upheld the judgment. The Court's decision vindicates Stonewall's hard lobbying to make it illegal to deny goods or services to someone just because they happen to
be gay. That obviously includes hotel rooms for many gay holidaymakers, which can only be a good thing in a Jubilee year. I hope Mr and Mrs Bull will now feel content to go home to do God's good work as Easter approaches, instead of relentlessly pursuing
a happy couple through the courts.
|
11th December 2011 | |
| Government declines to support gay discriminators claiming religious discrimination
|
See
article from
dailymail.co.uk
|
George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury has slammed the government for refusing to support a group of Christians fighting for what they perceive as their right to continue discriminating against gays. Four individuals who have been
disciplined at work or lost their jobs after refusing to remove crosses or to conform to gay rights laws are attempting to overturn the decisions of British courts and tribunal via a legal case at the European Court of Human Rights. They had hoped
for support from Ministers after a former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey, appealed to Prime Minister David Cameron on their behalf. But the Government told the European Court of Human Rights that it backed the British judges and does not
accept that the Christians have themselves suffered religious discrimination in being sacked for discriminating against gays. To the dismay of Lord Carey, the Government even said that wearing a cross or a crucifix was not a generally
recognised Christian practice. Lord Carey said: I am very disappointed for the individuals concerned who have simply followed their conscience. Such is the result of a liberal establishment that has become deeply
illiberal.
Christian lawyers claim the rights of the four to express their anti-gay beliefs at work should be protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, which allows individuals to manifest their faith in public.
But the Government, in 40 pages of legal arguments drawn up by the Foreign Office, said they were not protected because neither wearing a cross nor following their conscience at work was a core requirement of their faith. The Government said: The
UK is entitled to conclude . . . that other than in limited prescribed circumstances, religious belief does not justify discriminating on grounds of sexual orientation.
|
12th December 2010 | |
| Nutter hoteliers in court over gay discrimination
|
Based on article from freethinker.co.uk
|
| Sorry our rooms are only for couples in a properly consummated marriage |
Enter the Chymorvah Private Hotel in Marazion, near Penzance, and in the bedrooms you will find open Bibles and Christian leaflets. Here at Chymorvah you will be met by a friendly welcome. Besides excellent food in plenty and comfortable beds,
you will find a warm hospitality and much happiness, mingled with good service. But only if you are heterosexual and married. And this, according to that bastion of paranoia, the Christian Legal Centre, has landed them deep in the soft and
smelly, for they are now facing a discrimination claim brought by a gay couple who were refused a double bed. Martyn Hall and his civil partner, Steven Preddy, from Bristol, have lodged a claim for damages, alleging sexual orientation
discrimination. The couple are claiming that the refusal to allow them to share a bed was: Direct discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. They are relying on Equality Act regulations and are claiming up to £5,000 in damages
against the hotel owners, who are now facing a civil action at Bristol County Court this coming Monday. The Christian Institute, which is assisting the Christian couple, is outraged, and has issued a statement saying: This case is about liberty
of conscience. This guesthouse is Mr and Mrs Bull's own home. They have rights too, and they should not be forced to act against their sincerely held religious beliefs under their own roof. This Christian couple are being put on trial for their beliefs.
Equality laws are being used as a sword rather than a shield. A judgement on the case will be made after Christmas. |
| |