|
Indian movie banned in Punjab and Haryana
|
|
|
| 26th February
2020
|
|
| See article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com |
Shooter is a 2020 India action film by Inderjit Singh Starring Jayy Randhawa.
Following in the steps of the Indian state of Punjab, the Haryana state government has imposed a ban on the screening of the Punjabi movie Shooter- based on the life and crimes of notorious gangster Sukha Kahlwan. As per the order
issued by Vijai Vardhan, additional chief secretary (home), the suspension of screening/exhibition of the movie in the state shall remain in force for two months. Filmmaker Kewal Singh has filed a petition within the High Court stating that the
Punjab authorities has banned its launch on February 10 with out seeing the movie. The movie has not but been issued a certificates by the censor board and neither has the movie been seen. T Earlier the Punjab authorities banned this movie claiming
that the movie is selling violence, crime and gang tradition, which may promote crime in Punjab. In the UK the film was passed 15 uncut for strong bloody violence, brief drug misuse.
|
|
India's film censors release the tallies of films banned
|
|
|
| 19th
February 2019
|
|
| See article from thehindu.com
|
India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has banned a total of 793 films in 16 years. The information was revealed in response to a request filed by Lucknow-based activist Dr Nutan Thakur. It said that between January 1, 2000 and March 31,
2016, the censor board banned 793 films from public exhibition. These include 586 Indian films and 207 foreign films. These totals were broken down as follows:
- 11 banned in 2007
- 10 banned in 2008
- 9 banned in 2010
- 82 banned in 2012-13
- 119 banned in 2013-14
- 152 banned in 2014-15
- 153 banned in 2015-16
|
|
Gay teen romance banned by India's film censors
|
|
|
| 10th June
2018
|
|
| 7th June 2018. See article from indy100.com
|
Love, Simon is a 2018 USA gay drama by Greg Berlanti. Starring Katherine Langford, Nick Robinson and Jennifer Garner.
From the producers of The Fault in Our Stars comes
the relatable and heartfelt coming-of-age film LOVE, SIMON. Everyone deserves a great love story, but for 17-year-old Simon, it's a bit complicated. The gay teenager hasn't come out yet, and doesn't know the identity of the anonymous classmate he's
fallen for online. Resolving both issues will be a hilarious, scary, life-changing adventure. The film was banned by the film censors of the Central Board of Film Certification on the day of its release. The CBFC has said little so
far beyond noting that the film was banned for gay content. The film contains no explicit content although there is a kiss between the two lads. In the UK the cinema release was passed 12A uncut for moderate sex references, infrequent
strong language. In the US the film was rated PG-13 for thematic elements, sexual references, language and teen partying Update: Film censor says that the ban is not down to him 10th June 2018.
See article from deccanchronicle.com CBFC chairperson Prasoon Joshi has completely denied that the CBFC
has banned on Love, Simon. He said that an adults-only CBFC 'A' certificate has been given to Love, Simon four months ago, on February 6, 2018 after 2 cuts described as minor. Another source from the CBFC says, This is one more attempt to use the
censor board to gain publicity for a film. However it is has not been made clear an alternative reason for the film being pulled from cinema s at the last moment. |
|
Banned film now available online to Indian Netflix subscribers
|
|
|
| 11th April
2018
|
|
| See
article from hindustantimes.com |
Unfreedom is a 2015 USA / India crime romance by Raj Amit Kumar. Starring Victor Banerjee, Adil Hussain and Bhanu Uday.
In New York arrives a violent and angry man imprisoned
by his brutal past, Mohammed Husain. His mission - to kidnap and kill a peaceful Muslim scholar, Fareed Rahmani. On the other side of the world, Leela Singh, a homosexual girl in New Delhi, kidnaps her bisexual lover, Sakhi Taylor. Her mission - to marry
her lover and live happily ever after. In a brutal struggle of identities against unfreedom, four characters, in two of the world's largest cities, come face to face with most gruesome acts of torture and violence. The choices they make when they are
most cornered in life, expose the blemished reality of contemporary world.
Almost three years after Unfreedom was banned in India by the Pahlaj Nihalani-led Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), on the grounds that it would
ignite unnatural passions, the film has been acquired by Netflix and can be watched by the streaming service's subscribers. After the film was refused certification by CBFC, the makers appealed at the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT),
only to be refused again. Talking about the film's release by Netflix, director Raj Amit Kumar said in a press statement: I am glad that Unfreedom finds such a popular platform like Netflix after the ban in
India and the efforts of censorship guardians in India to stop the film. It also exposes the hypocrisy and divide between reality and fantasy of censorship system in India. There is no way they can control and censor content in digital age, yet, they try
their best to choke filmmakers like me who have something relevant to say that makes them feel threatened.
|
|
21 Months of Hell documentary banned in India citing the requirement for impossible to obtain proof
|
|
|
| 2nd January 2018
|
|
| See article
from thenewsminute.com |
21 Months of Hell is a 2017 documentary by Yadu Vijayakrishnan.
In June 25th 1975, Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi declared Emergency
on the nation which bestowed her the authority to rule by decree, allowing elections to be suspended and civil liberties to be curbed. This resulted in the mass arrests of leaders and activists of opposition who she saw as a threat to her political life.
With the introduction of the new law MISA(Maintenance of Internal Security Act), anyone could be arrested without fair trial or evidences. Making use of the political atmosphere and direct orders from the government, the police department exercised their
aggression at free will. For the pro-democracy activists, India became a literal hell from the day of declaration of the Emergency until its withdrawal 21 months later. The documentary '21 Months of Hell' explores the ingenious torture method
administered by the Police for intimidating political prisoners at that time. With the real life accounts of surviving victims of the torture.
A documentary about India's Emergency , titled 21 Months of Hell , has been
banned by Kerala's regional office of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The Emergency refers to a state of Emergency called in India from 1975-77 when Indira Gandhi was granted almost unlimited powers to quell unrest. The
78-minute documentary deals with the alleged methods of torture employed by the police against detainees during the Emergency. The director Yadu Vijayakrishnan told PTI that the documentary mainly features interviews of victims of the Emergency
along with the re-enactment of scenes of the alleged tortures methods recreated with actors Vijayakrishnan said the CBFC asked for proof of the torture methods used by the police during the Emergency. Though there are testimonies of surviving
victims and case reports, the Board wanted written government proof of the torture methods of that time. And of course the government is hardy likely to allow public access to records proving its own recourse to torture. |
|
After a long battle with film censors, the gay film Ka Bodyscapes is unbanned, but only after cuts
|
|
|
| 24th
September 2017
|
|
| See
article from firstpost.com |
Ka Bodyscapes is a 2016 India / USA gay drama by Jayan Cherian. Starring Adhithi, Tinto Arayani and Arundhathi.
Three young people, Haris, a gay painter; Vishnu, a
rural kabaddi player and their friend Sia, an activist who refuse to conform to dominant norms of femininity, struggle to find space and happiness in a conservative Indian City. After a long battle with India's film censors of the CBFC,
and with the help of a little pressure from the Kerala high court, the CBFC have finally granted Ka Bodyscapes an adults only 'A' rating, after demanding the following cuts:
- Removal of all references to the right wing nationalist political party, RSS, and the saffron flag wherever they appear in the movie.
- Additionally, the makers of the film have also been directed to delete all the visuals containing photos of
the RSS founder KB Hedgewar and ideologue MS Golwalkar from the movie,
- removal of a scene with a female character that is shown masturbating.
- The supposedly objectionable and disrespectful visual of a painting depicting Lord Hanuman
carrying books in his hand.
|
|
India's film censors still quick to ban films, dashing recent hopes of the new film censor bringing with him a more grownup approach
|
|
|
| 10th September 2017
|
|
| See article from thequint.com
|
India's Central Board Of Film Certification on Thursday banned a film, the first to get the treatment after Prasoon Joshi took over as the chief censor. The offending film is titled X Zone , produced and directed by Faisal Kapadi. According to
CBFC sources, scenes of sex and nudity including, apparently, a frontal nudity shot of actress Hrishita Bhatt were the cause of the ban. This dashes recent hopes that all films, regardless of content, can be passed with an adults only 'A' rating.
Not so, says a source close to the CBFC, sleaze won't get passed. That won't change. |
|
Indian film ban helps make a film a 'super hit' in India and then helps get a theatrical release in the US
|
|
|
|
8th September 2017
|
|
| See article from
ww2.kqed.org |
Lipstick Under My Burkha is a 2016 India drama by Alankrita Shrivastava. Starring Shashank Arora, Plabita Borthakur and Sonal Jha.
Set in the crowded by-lanes of small town India,
Lipstick Under My Burkha chronicles the secret lives of four women in search of a little freedom. Though stifled and trapped in their worlds, these four women claim their desires through small acts of courage and stealthy rebellion.
The award-winning film
Lipstick Under My Burkha , which was originally banned in India by film censors opens in U.S. theaters this Friday. It will open in six theaters in California. Writer and director Alankrita Shrivastava's movie, a dramatic comedy, focuses on
four Bhopal women rebelling against long held taboos, many of them sexual, in their tiny conservative town. The independent film came under scrutiny from India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), which kept it from being released in January of
this year, citing issues with its sexual nature. In its decision, the CBFC faulted the film for being lady oriented. Shrivastava explained during a panel discussion: They did what they could in their power to stop the
film from being exhibited. But what I think is interesting is that when this decision became public, the women of India really stood up. For the first time, I felt that Indian mainstream media was discussing things like the male gaze and how the
portrayal of women has been controlled by men.
After appealing the ban, Shrivastava compromised with the CBFC, volunteering more than 16 cuts to the film. After then being approved for release, the controversy helped the movie and it
became a super hit, recovering its production costs four days after its initial release. |
|
New Indian film censor quickly bans his first film, Toofan Singh
|
|
|
| 24th August 2017
|
|
| See
article from firstpost.com |
Toofan Singh is a 2017 India action film by Baghal Singh and Gurcharan Virk. Starring Ranjit Bawa, Avtar Gill and Raza Murad.
The journey of a Punjabi Sikh boy who grew up during the chaotic, violent
1980s revolving around his chase for survival, equality and justice in order to protect and shield society and fight against brutality, crime and corruption.
India's new chief film censor hasn't got off to a very good start as he has
already banned his first film. Even as Prasoon Joshi stepped into the chairman's role at the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), reports have emerged of the new regime's first edict: banning the Punjabi film, Toofan Singh , on
grounds of supposed excessive violence. Poster of Punjabi film Toofan Singh. Toofan Singh, directed by Baghal Singh and starring Ranjit Bawa in the title role, tells the story of a man who adopts terrorist-like tactics in order to fight
corruption in Indian politics and bureaucracy. A source from the CBFC reportedly said: The film is brutal and anarchic. We couldn't empathise with its message of brute power, let alone grant it a censor
certificate
In the UK, the film was passed 18 uncut for strong bloody violence, scenes of torture
|
|
Indian film censor's ban on a woman oriented film overturned by appeals tribunal
|
|
|
| 26th April 2017
|
|
| See article from deccanherald.com
|
The Indian Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) has directed the Central Board Film Certification (CBFC) to grant an adults-only A certificate to the Hindi film Lipstick Under My Burkha with cuts. Upholding the appeal filed
by the film's director Alankrita Srivastava and producer Prakash Jha, the Tribunal noted that there was no violation of guidelines. Neither the visuals nor the dialogues in the film were contemptuous of racial, religious or other groups, as
claimed by the CBFC. the tribunal also refuted other CBFC claims by noting: There was no targeting of women of certain community or religion. The Tribunal explained that the examining committee and revising committee of the CBFC misdirected themselves
in denying certification on the ground that the story of the film was women oriented. Tribunal head Justice Manmohan Sarin said: There cannot be any embargo on a film being women oriented or containing sexual
fantasies and expression of the inner desires of women. The entire matter has to be considered in the perspective of the theme of the film, the story, the characters and the overall impact of the film. As a matter of general
approach if the aspect of sexual desires and their expression is sensitively handled without bringing coarseness, vulgarity or obscenity, pandering prurient tendencies, then it is not to be disallowed.
During hearing of the matter,
the appellant offered voluntary cuts or reduction in the length of the sex scenes or others which may have been considered unduly long or unnecessary. However all is not freedom and enlightenment at the FCAT, the tribunal suggested that the
sex scenes should by censored as should one occurrence of an 'inappropriate' word. Update: Unbanned 8th May 2017 See
article from deccanherald.com After the successful appeal, the film was duly awarded an adults only 'A' rating
after the cuts agreed at the appeal. |
|
Indian film censor bans 77 films in a year
|
|
|
| 19th March 2017
|
|
| See article from bollywoodhungama.com
|
India's crazed film censor, Pahlaj Nihalani, has overseen the banning of 77 films in a 12 month period of 2015-16. The CBFC banned 77 films in 2015-16, as against 47 films in 2014-15 and 23 films the year before that, clearly indicating a rise
when under the governance of Pahlaj Nihalani. Filmmakers are justifiably unimpressed. Increasing numbers of filmmakers raising their voices against the chief censor, noting that he has been imposing archaic laws on their films.
|
|
India's film censors re-affirm their ban of the gay film Ka Bodyscapes.
|
|
|
| 8th March 2017
|
|
| See article from indianexpress.com
|
Ka Bodyscapes is a 2016 India / USA gay drama by Jayan Cherian. Starring Adhithi, Tinto Arayani and Arundhathi.
Three young people, Haris, a gay painter; Vishnu, a
rural kabaddi player and their friend Sia, an activist who refuse to conform to dominant norms of femininity, struggle to find space and happiness in a conservative Indian City.
Ka Bodyscapes was originally banned by the Indian film
censors of the CBFC in July 2016. The distributors challenged the ban in court resulting in a September 2016 court order for the censors to explain their ban and to consider possible cuts instead. But the CBFC decided to appeal against the
court order and re-affirmed their ban in March 2017. A 2nd Revising Committee from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has refused to certify the Malayalam film Ka Bodyscapes, saying it glorified the subject of gay and homosexual
relationship and portrayed the Hindu religion in a derogatory manner by showing Hanuman in poor light as gay . It also objected to the portrayal of a Muslim woman masturbating. |
|
Indian court calls the CBFC's bluff over reasons for banning the gay themed film Ka Bodyscapes
|
|
|
| 3rd October 2016
|
|
| See article from thehindu.com
|
Ka Bodyscapes is a 2016 India / USA gay drama by Jayan Cherian. Starring Adhithi, Tinto Arayani and Arundhathi.
Three young people, Haris, a gay painter; Vishnu, a rural kabaddi player and
their friend Sia, an activist who refuse to conform to dominant norms of femininity, struggle to find space and happiness in a conservative Indian City. A revising committee of the CBFC banned the film in July 2016 citing:
The revising committee felt that the entire content of the Malayalam feature film Ka Bodyscapes is ridiculing, insulting and humiliating Hindu religion, in particular portraying Hindu Gods in poor light. Derogatory words are used
against women. The Hindu God 'Hanuman' is shown as coming in the books titled 'I am Gay' and other homosexual books. The film has also references to lady masturbating, highlighting 'gay' by many 'gay' posters. The film offends human sensibilities by
vulgarity, obscenity and depravity. The film makers have been contesting the ban in court and appear to have made progress. The Kerala High Court has set aside the recommendation of the revising committee of India's Central
Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to ban the public screening of Malayalam film KA Bodyscapes , produced and directed by the New York-based filmmaker Jayan Cherian. Justice P.B. Suresh Kumar also directed the revising committee to make
clearer the reasons for banning the screening of the film with specific reference to the theme of the film and relevant guidelines. The court added that if the objection concerned only the depiction of the Hindu God Hanuman and the reference to
masturbation of women and homosexuality, there was no need to ban the exhibition of the film, as the scenes could be deleted or modified. |
|
Two Indian states ban the movie, The Legend of Michael Mishra
|
|
|
| 7th
August 2016
|
|
| See
article from timesofindia.indiatimes.com |
The Legend of Michael Mishra is a 2016 India comedy drama by Manish Jha. Starring Aditi Rao Hydari, Boman Irani and Arshad Warsi.
The CBFC-certified film The Legend of Michael Mishra, released on Friday, has been
banned by two state governments. The film cannot now be screened in Punjab and Haryana. The Punjab government banned the film following protests over a dialogue in the film referring to Maharishi Valmiki. On Saturday, cinema chains and halls in
Haryana received first a phone call, and then a letter issued by the state government, banning the film for eight weeks. The letter was dated Friday, but was received only on Saturday afternoon, following phone calls apparently made that morning by
entertainment tax officials to cinema halls, asking them to cancel the film's shows in Gurgaon and elsewhere. The two governments issued the order to ban the film because, as the Haryana government's letter says:
Tthere are strong reasons to apprehend that if the film is screened in the State, there could be protests by different organizations/individuals which may cause damage to private as well as to public property resulting in serious law
& order situation in the State. It has the potential to endanger the peace and social harmony in the State. The Haryana letter was issued even after the film's producers had voluntarily removed the dialogue, despite the CBFC
having certified it. On Friday, the film's publicist issued a statement quoting Kishor Arora, producer, Eyecandy Films, saying: We have a valid Censor certification and voluntarily removed the objectionable matter as
we do not wish to hurt anyone's sentiments. It's very sad that in spite of all this, we are facing difficulties in exhibiting the film. Where do we go seek redressal (sic).
|
|
Indian film censors ban gay film, Ka Bodyscapes
|
|
|
|
27th July 2016
|
|
| See article from thehindu.com
|
Ka Bodyscapes is a 2016 India / USA gay drama by Jayan Cherian. Starring Adhithi, Tinto Arayani and Arundhathi.
Three young people, Haris, a gay painter; Vishnu, a rural kabaddi player and
their friend Sia, an activist who refuse to conform to dominant norms of femininity, struggle to find space and happiness in a conservative Indian City.
India's Central Board of Film Classification (CBFC), taking umbrage at what it
decided are vulgar and offensive scenes in it, has banned the Malayalam film Ka Bodyscapes produced and directed by New York-based film-maker Jayan Cherian. In a rejection letter sent to the maker of the film, A. Prathibha, regional officer
of the CBFC in Thiruvananthapuram, wrote: The revising committee felt that the entire content of the Malayalam feature film Ka Bodyscapes is ridiculing, insulting and humiliating Hindu religion, in particular
portraying Hindu Gods in poor light. Derogatory words are used against women. The Hindu God 'Hanuman' is shown as coming in the books titled 'I am Gay' and other homosexual books. The film has also references to lady masturbating, highlighting 'gay' by
many 'gay' posters. The film offends human sensibilities by vulgarity, obscenity and depravity.
The CBFC regional office had earlier referred the film, which is woven around a gay love story, to the review committee. It transferred
the review screening to Chennai and postponed it on the eve of the screening scheduled for July 5. Finally, as the maker accused the board of dragging its feet on certifying the film, the review committee watched it on July 15. Cherian accused the
board of suffering from homophobia: Their basic attitude towards and idea of same sex love is that it's vulgar and obscene.
He said he will move the High Court of Kerala for relief.
|
|
Indian film censors ban another film, Salagto Sawal Anamat
|
|
|
| 2nd July
2016
|
|
| See article from timesofindia.indiatimes.com
|
The Gujarati film Salagto Sawal Anamat (Burning Question Reservation), has formally been banned by the Centre Board of Film Certification (CBFC). For now, it will not be released in theatres anymore. The producers of the movie were informed
that the CBFC claimed that the movie may pose a threat to the integrity and sovereignty of India . Giving reasons for denial of certification, a CBFC letter states that the film on Patidar quota stir consists of visuals or words which
promote communal, obscurantist, anti-scientific and anti-national attitude. It further states that the movie shows visuals or words contemptuous of racial, religious or other groups and that the security of the State is jeopardized."
Now the filmmakers may be forced to court to contest the CBFC's denial of certification. The director of the film Rajesh Gohil said: CBFC officials had agreed on an A' certification only if we removed certain
scenes that it considered objectionable including two songs glorifying the Patidar community for their struggle.
Gohil said that if they had edited the film the way the CBFC wanted then the length of film would have been reduced to 80
minutes from the current 150 minutes. |
|
CBFC bans the Hollywood comedy, Dirty Grandpa
|
|
|
| 17th April 2016
|
|
| See article from skjbollywoodnews.com |
Dirty Grandpa is a 2016 USA comedy by Dan Mazer. Starring Robert De Niro, Julianne Hough and Zac Efron.
India: Banned in March 2016 Dirty Grandpa has been rejected by the CBFC and the appeals Tribunal for its bold content. A source from the CBFC added: We've placed a ban on
Dirty Grandpa because this grandpa is dirtier than any 70-year old man has the right to be. In fact de Niro in this film makes Rishi Kapoorin Kapoor & Sons look like a saint. We wonder why an actor of De Niros caliber did such a foul-mouthed cheap
film.
For comparison, in the UK, the Unrated Extended Version was passed 15 uncut for strong sex references, strong nudity, drug use, strong language for:
- 2016 Lions Gate [Extended + Theatrical Versions] RB Blu-ray at UK Amazon
Summary Notes Right before his wedding, an uptight guy is tricked into driving his grandfather, a perverted former Army general, to Florida for spring break.
|
|
Indian film censors ban political documentary
|
|
|
|
30th August 2015
|
|
| See
article from indianexpress.com |
The Battle for Banaras is a 2014 India documentary by Kamal Swaroop. Starring Neil Nitin Mukesh, Sikandar Agarwal and Aditya Bhattacharya.
Inspired by Nobel laureate Elias Canetti's book,
'Crowds and Power', the documentary captures the excitement, the madness and the noise behind the high- octane poll battle in the holy city of Banaras, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi's parliamentary constituency. And in the process, for the first
time lays bare the equation and politics of democracy called India.
Indian film censors have banned a political documentary, Battle of Banaras. The film studies the high-profile electoral battle between Prime Minister Narendra
Modi and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal in Varanasi during the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. CBFC chairman Pahlaj Nihalani, who hasn't watched the film, later said: My officers told me that it's a
political satire. It speaks against all politicians and is pro-Kejriwal in the way it has been shot. The people who reviewed it are experienced enough to know what is right and wrong. They found the kind of language that has been used in the film
absolutely unsuitable for public viewing. It is inflammatory and flouts the CBFC guidelines.
Defending his film, Kamal Swaroop said it is strictly non-political and doesn't take any sides. He said: I have nothing to do with AAP or the BJP . It's none of my business as a filmmaker. The film follows the festivities around the elections. I have observed the candidates fighting the election as a physical phenomenon.
Swaroop still has appeal option and he has decided to take the documentary to the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT). |
|
Indian film censors ban Magic Mike XXL, but there's still an appeal board to try
|
|
|
| 9th July 2015
|
|
| See
article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com |
Magic Mike XXL is a 2015 USA comedy music drama by Gregory Jacobs. Starring Amber Heard, Channing Tatum and Elizabeth Banks.
The continuing story of male stripper, Magic Mike.
There's no kissing, no BDSM, no violence, only lots of male stripping. But the Magic Mike sequel, scheduled to open in India on July 3, is unlikely to arrive. Pahlaj Nihalani, the loony chairperson of the Central Board for Film
Certification (CBFC), along with members of the Examining Committee, watched Magic Mike XXL. At the end of the screening, they announced in no uncertain terms, that the comedy-drama could not be per mitted to release in India because of all the sexual
energy on display. Tthe producers then had a second screening for an eight-member Revising Committee. Five of them were ready to clear the film with half-a-dozen cuts, the remaining three rejected it. A spokesman explained:
Since there is a difference of opinion, Warner Bros. will have to go to the appeal Tribunal or not release the film in India. A Warner Bros. Pictures India spokesperson told Mirror:
The film stands postponed. Once cleared we will definitely release it in India. |
|
Sunny Leone's Mastizaade, banned by Indian film censors
|
|
|
| 19th
June 2015
|
|
| See article from
bollywoodhungama.com |
Mastizaade is a 2015 India film by Milap Zaveri. Starring Sunny Leone, Zachary Coffin and Tusshar Kapoor.
After being banned by the Examining Committee and the Revising Committee, the new
Sunny Leone starrer Mastizaade directed by Milap Zaveri has now been refused certification by the appeals Tribunal. The Appeals Tribunal wrote: There is no redeeming feature of any sort in the film. The film is
only concerned with the exploration of the different parts of the human anatomy, both male and female, and is such as to deprave the minds of the audience. We are thus constrained to hold that. Freedom of expression cannot and should not be interpreted
as a license for the cine-magnates to make huge sums of money by pandering to shoddy and vulgar tastes.
|
|
Indian film censors ban lesbian themed thriller
|
|
|
| 4th April 2015
|
|
| 30th March 2015. See
article from
mumbaimirror.com |
Unfreedom is a 2015 USA / India crime romance by Raj Amit Kumar. Starring Victor Banerjee, Adil Hussain and Bhanu Uday.
In New York arrives a violent and angry man imprisoned by his brutal past,
Mohammed Husain. His mission - to kidnap and kill a peaceful Muslim scholar, Fareed Rahmani. On the other side of the world, Leela Singh, a homosexual girl in New Delhi, kidnaps her bisexual lover, Sakhi Taylor. Her mission - to marry her lover and live
happily ever after. In a brutal struggle of identities against unfreedom, four characters, in two of the world's largest cities, come face to face with most gruesome acts of torture and violence. The choices they make when they are most cornered in life,
expose the blemished reality of contemporary world.
India: Banned by the CBFC, March 2015 The film is the story of a young girl who resists a forced arranged marriage to unite with her lesbian partner. The
nudity and lovemaking scenes of the female protagonists, 'outraged' the Indian Board of film censors. Add to it a parallel story line which revolves around a liberal Muslim kidnapped by a terrorist and the CBFC was up in arms. Speaking from
the US, the director told Mirror, The two stories are juxtaposed and the film challenges the idea of religious fundamentalism and questions its connection with homosexuality which is a biting reality of India. He added that the film was
refused by both the Examining Committee and the Revising Committee. They plainly told me that after watching the film, Hindu and Muslims will start fighting and will ignite unnatural passions. I was aghast as my film is not provocative. The
filmmaker then appealed to the Film Certification Apellate Tribunal (FCAT) but this time too, he was denied a certificate. I'm making an appeal in the High Court now as the Censor Board cannot tell a filmmaker what to make and what not to, said
the filmmaker
Update: Director to appeal the ban in court 4th April 2015. See
article from hindustantimes.com
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) recently banned the release of Unfreedom, a film based on a lesbian relationship, on the grounds that it will supposedly ignite unnatural passions . The board reportedly also had a problem
with a storyline in which a liberal Muslim girl is kidnapped by terrorists. Kumar has decided to file court case against the CBFC. I have appealed to the high court asking them to allow me to release the film. The director said that
the board primarily had a problem with the portrayal of religious fundamentalism in the film. Everyone believes that the reason for banning the film is homosexuality, but that's just a part of the problem. The religious fundamentalism, which I
am dealing with in the film, bothers them even more, Kumar said. The chief censor, Pahlaj Nihalani said: The film was brought to the censor board back in November last year, when I had not even joined
office. They (previous panel) had not cleared the film. So, the filmmaker approached the Examining Committee later, which refused a certification to the film. He then went to the Revising Committee, which passed the film with an A certificate, after
suggesting a few cuts. However, the producer was still not satisfied, and he approached the tribunal (the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal) in Delhi. And the Tribunal also refused to certify the film. And now, the director is planning to move the
court.
Kumar spoke of the cuts requested by the censors: I don't even want to talk about the kind of cuts they asked me to make in my film. It was not only cutting a few scenes, it was more about
removing a particular thought and expression. They have no business telling a filmmaker what to put in his film. They cannot curb our creativity. Who are they to decide what goes in my film and what doesn't.
|
|
Unfreedom movie banned in India by the CBFC
|
|
|
| 15th February
2015
|
|
| See article from
indiatvnews.com |
Unfreedom (aka Blemished Light) is a 2015 USA / India crime romance by Raj Amit Kumar. Starring Victor Banerjee, Adil Hussain and Bhanu Uday.
In New York arrives a violent and angry man imprisoned by his brutal past,
Mohammed Husain. His mission - to kidnap and kill a peaceful Muslim scholar, Fareed Rahmani. On the other side of the world, Leela Singh, a homosexual girl in New Delhi, kidnaps her bisexual lover, Sakhi Taylor. Her mission - to marry her lover and live
happily ever after. In a brutal struggle of identities against unfreedom, four characters, in two of the world's largest cities, come face to face with most gruesome acts of torture and violence. The choices they make when they are most cornered in life,
expose the blemished reality of contemporary world.
Unfreedom , a new Indian film by Raj Amit Kumar has been banned in India. However it will be released in North American theatres and simultaneously on digital channels on May
29. According to a media release Unfreedom juxtaposes two powerful and unflinching contemporary stories about religious fundamentalism and intolerance. Shifting between New York and New Delhi, one tale follows a Muslim terrorist who kidnaps a
liberal Muslim scholar in order to silence him, while the other charts the travails of a young woman whose devout father tries to force her into an arranged marriage, which she resists because she is secretly in love with another woman. Recently,
Unfreedom was banned in India, where homosexuality was criminalised in 2013, by the Censor Board of Film Certification (CBFC), rendering much of its content too controversial for general audiences. |
|
Indian film censor resigns after her ban on the movie MSG is overturned on appeal
|
|
|
|
30th January 2015
|
|
| 17th January 2014. See article from
bbc.co.uk |
India's censor board chief has resigned after reports that a film rejected by her panel has been cleared for release. Leela Samson quit after an appeals board approved the film Messenger of God , directed by and starring Gurmeet Ram Rahim
Singh. Samson's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) had found the film unsuitable for the public, reportedly because it promoted superstition. She also accused the state-run CBFC of corruption and coercion . Messenger of God
was cleared by the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal. A CBFC member, Nandini Sardesai, said supported her boss saying: We all saw the movie. It was the collective decision of eight of us that the movie was
not suitable for public viewing.
Later 9 members of the Central Board of Film Certification sent their resignation letters to the Information and Broadcasting Minister on citing interference and corruption in the ministry. In their
letter to the I&B Minister, CBFC members said: The events that led to the Chairperson Ms. Leela Samson resigning from her position are merely the proverbial last straw. We have been asking for some critical
changes, which are imperative to the functioning of the CBFC. Not a single positive step has been taken by the Ministry.
Government sources said the members who have quit were on their way out anyway adding that a new censor board
will be announced soon. Update: Now 13 18th January 2015. See
article from
indiantelevision.com The resignation count has risen to 13 members resigning to support Leela Samson. Update: New censor 20th
January 2015. From ibnlive.in.com
Filmmaker Pahlaj Nihalani has been appointed as new chairperson of Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). This comes after Leela Samson resigned last week. Nihalani said he will do his job without any controversy and he also said that there
was nothing wrong in the way MSG - Messenger of God was cleared by appellate Tribunal. Nine new members have also been appointed to the board to replace those resigning with Samson. Update: State censors
22nd January 2015. See article from
theguardian.com The composition of the new board, especially the number of BJP (the ruling Indian nationalist party) sympathisers on it, does little to allay the accusations
made by Samson and her co-workers. In the runup to last year's general elections, Nihalani directed a music video praising the current prime minister, Narendra Modi. During a television interview on Tuesday, he said he was proud to be a BJP person
, and called Modi his action hero and the voice of the nation . He blames the previous government, saying the [board's] problems started during their tenure. Three other new members are either BJP leaders or have ties to its
nationalist parent organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. One of them even contested the 2014 general elections on a BJP ticket. MSG is now slated for release on 6 February. The chief minister of Punjab, whose state had earlier banned the
film due to the communique regarding public safety concerns, has said the government will review the order. Update: A vulgar censor 24th January 2015. See
article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com India's new film censor quickly set out his stall by having a good whinge at supposedly vulgar TV. He whined that there is too much
nudity on television and internet which should be controlled. Speaking to TOI Pahlaj Nihalani whinged:, Nudity is available online and on certain TV programs like live fashion shows. It should be in sync with the rules
followed in films. There should be one policy for nudity (portrayal of sex in films).
He said that while films on TV, promos went through a certification process, many live programmes were subject to self-regulation. The
self-regulation is not being followed. There is vulgarity on TV...it should be controlled, he said. Nihalani who in a recent interview described PM Narendra Modi as his action hero defended his words:
I am a big fan of BJP. I admire Modiji for his leadership qualities and people are very happy that he is in power. There are expectations from him and as a citizen of this country I am motivated to move ahead.
Update: Ranting and raving
30th January 2015. See article from
filmibeat.com
India's new chief film censor, Pahlaj Nihalani, has been ranting and raving about increasing film censorship. He has also has a whinge about the internet and 'how it will affect the nation's youth': I am talking about
the material that is uploaded. For instance, take Sunny Leone. We accepted her as an artist. And with her popularity, everybody, from school kids to grown ups, have watched her sites (adult films). People are paying money to watch her. How can there be
tolerance for all this? What will the new generation learn?. I don't mind being called conservative if I have to serve the nation. You have to take care of the new generation, on whom the future of the country depends. So how can
we allow ourselves to give them wrong education? The censor board is very liberal. But what is the modern generation watching? We are giving them the license to see anything. How is this projecting our culture? Everything is free online and as you can
see the youth is misusing it. Even for the online platform, I feel there should be rules and without censorship material should not be uploaded. On television, they watch content without any censor. Many live programmes come
without censor, especial the comedy and fashion shows. So much vulgarity they show on TV. On many live shows you can see short skirts and lingerie. How can you tolerate all this? What is the meaning of censorship then?
|
|
Banned by the Indian censor, unbanned on appeal, re-banned in the Punjab
|
|
|
|
19th January 2015
|
|
| See article from
pinkvilla.com |
Amidst the censorship drama at the Indian film censor's office, the Punjab government Saturday banned the screening of the film MSG - The Messenger Of God , which features Dera Sacha Sauda sect chief, Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh. The film was
cleared by the Certification Appellate Tribunal's (FCAT) despite not getting clearance from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) and its revising committee. Update: Box office hit 20th February 2015. See
article from zeenews.india.com
MSG - The Messenger, featuring Dera Sacha Sauda sect head Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, has left the cash registers ringing at the Box-Office. The film was released on February 13 in 4,000 screens across the country. It collected a
whopping Rs 61.15 crores at the Box Office within just four days of its release. The movie was given a release certificate by the Censor Board in early February. But the Punjab and Uttarakhand government has banned the screening of the film
claiming law and order problems. |
|
Indian film censors look set to ban MSG after pressure from religious groups and the government
|
|
|
| 15th January 2015
|
|
| See
article from
firstpost.com |
MSG: The Messenger of God is a 2015 India action comedy drama by Jeetu Arora and Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Ji Insan. Starring Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Ji Insan, Daniel Kaleb and Fllora Saini.
India's film censor board has refused to clear MSG: The Messenger of God featuring self-styled guru Ram Rahim Singh. The Censor Board (CBFC) has decided to refer the decision to the Film Certification Apellate Tribunal (FCAT).
Officials said a review committee of the Board took the decision unanimously. CBFC chairperson Leela Samson told PTI: It has been unanimously decided to refer the film to the tribunal FCAT.
Whilst
waiting for the results of the appeal the movie will miss its opening date previously set for 16th January 2015. In the movie, Ram Rahim Singh depicts himself as a god. The censors apparently have objections to Ram Rahim being shown to be
performing miracles and curing terminal diseases. Singh is head of a spiritual orginsation called Dera Sacha Sauda (DSS). He said he was not averse to cutting some scenes if the censor board objected to them. He claimed that:
The only aim of the film is to spread messages against social evils like drug addiction, female foeticide. There is nothing wrong in it. If the board finds any portion of the film objectionable, I will happily get them removed.
I have not showed myself as God but as a human. I have not criticised any religion in the film. The Home Ministry had sent an advisory to states where the movie is set to play which said:
Various Sikh organisations and individuals are opposing the movie on the ground that its release would disturb the communal harmony and law and order. They also opine that glorification of DSS chief, facing serious criminal cases,
should not be allowed. Meanwhile in the UK, the BBFC have passed the film 12A uncut for moderate violence, sex references, drug use, for its upcoming cinema release. |
|
Hollywood comedy unbanned in India after 10 minutes of cuts
|
|
|
| 26th August
2014
|
|
| See article from
mid-day.com |
The revising committee of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has cleared the Hollywood comedy, Sex Tape , giving it an adults only A certificate. The committee asked the film's distributors to cut around 10 minutes' footage from
the film. Committee chairman Nandini Sardesai said: Several scenes shown before the title of the film feature frontal nudity and blatant sexual intercourse which was definitely not beautiful; we have asked distributors
to cut them out. The distributors were armed with a proper self-censorship sheet and they even offered to cut more scenes if needed. We have already pointed out the deletions and they have agreed to carry them out.
The film was previosuly set for release in India in the first week of August. But last month, the examining committee of the CBFC denied the film a certificate due to its adult content. |
|
India's film censor bans Dilli 1984
|
|
|
| 25th August
2014
|
|
| See article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com |
India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has banned another film dealing with the turbulence of 1984. Dilli 1984 , based on the anti-Sikh riots in Delhi, has not been certified on the grounds that the board could not even suggest cuts as
the entire film was disturbing. The film was screened before the board on August 14 and was denied a certificate four days later. The film's director Ashok Gupta, said: We had kept the film very close to the
reality and showed the truth which apparently was uncomfortable.
|
|
India bans film about the assassination of Indira Gandhi
|
|
|
| 22nd
August 2014
|
|
| See article
from deccanchronicle.com |
Kaum De Heere is a 2014 India drama by Ravinder Ravi Starring R aj Kakra , Gurpreet
Ghuggi , and Rahul Devi
India has banned the release of a film based on the assassination of former
Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi, after complaints it glorified her killers. The film, Kaum De Heere , (Real Heroes), had been scheduled for release on Friday. It tells the story of Ms Gandhi's Sikh bodyguards who shot her dead
apparently to avenge her decision to send troops in a deadly raid on the Golden Temple. Sikhs say thousands were murdered when the army entered Sikhism's holiest shrine in Amritsar to flush out militants. Mrs Gandhi's assassination triggered an outburst
of communal violence targeted at Sikhs and more than 3,000 Sikhs were killed in attacks across India. Officials of the home and information and broadcasting ministries and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) saw the film again and
deemed it not fit for release. Chief film censor Leela Samson said after a review of the movie: We saw the film and decided that it must not be released.
The home ministry earlier voiced serious
concern at the content of the Punjabi film, and asked the I&B ministry to take a relook at its clearance. It said the Punjabi-language film Kaum De Heere may affect communal harmony in Punjab and other northern states. There were reports that
CBFC CEO Rakesh Kumar, who was arrested by the CBI recently for corruption, had previously cleared the film after allegedly taking Rs 100,000. The Congress Party - which Indira Gandhi led - had previously threatened to carry out protests if the
film was released and the party's youth wing also wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi asking for the film to be banned, saying it presented her assassins as heroes. In the UK, the film was passed 15 uncut for strong bloody violence.
Update: Censored whilst claiming to be uncensored 25th August 2014. See
article from
totalfilmy.com After Kaum De Heere was banned the producer of controversial film has threatened to take legal action against the censor board. The producers say, the
prohibition is not justified given that it is based on true incidents, as per the findings of the Justice Thakkar Commission that had probed the assassination. Moreover, contrary to media reports the film does not portray the killers as heroes but
presents the actual chain of events and give biographical accounts of Satwant, Beant and Kehar Singh. Satish Katiyal stated: We are consulting our lawyer. First, we will file a case against the censor board. We
will go to court and then we will go to public. There is nothing controversial in the film. The Centre has banned the film due to political pressure. It is a rumour that we bribed to get our film cleared from censor board.
|
|
Hollywood comedy Sex Tape banned by the CBFC
|
|
|
| 25th
July 2014
|
|
| See article from
mid-day.com |
Sex Tape is a 2014 USA comedy by Jake Kasdan. Starring Jason Segel, Cameron Diaz and Rob Corddry.
Summary Notes A married couple wake up to discover that the sex tape they made the evening before has gone missing, leading to a frantic search for its whereabouts. UK: rated 15
uncut for strong sex references, sex, very strong language, drug use US: Rated R (17) for strong sexual content, nudity, language and some drug use.
India: The film was banned by the CBFC in July 2014
A source from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) says, Owing to excess vulgarity in the film, we have decided to not certify the film. A former member of the board says: Hollywood films are usually viewed as 'more corruptible' than Hindi films and they get rejected for their overt sexual content and brutal violence. But in the case of Hindi films, producers get away with a lot more.
Also, Hollywood films that have sexually provocative themes or titles tend to bear the brunt. It is a knee-jerk reaction and is not the right way to certify films. Why shouldn't an adult film be cleared with an A certificate?
Aren't 18-year-olds mature enough to watch films with sexual or violent content?
|
|
Indian film censors ban Vedivazhipadu for offending religious sentiments
|
|
|
| 28th
November 2013
|
|
| From indiaglitz.com
|
Indian Film censors of the Central Board of Film Classification have banned the new movie Vedivazhipadu by debutant director Shambhu Purushothaman. The movie was denied a censor certificate for supposedly offending religious sentiments. The
film tells of the activities of a few husbands when their wives are away for the pongala offerings at the famous temple at the capital city. |
|
The movie Silk Sakkath Hot has been banned for a few days pending a court hearing to consider claims of harm to society
|
|
|
|
9th August 2013
|
|
| See article from
entertainment.oneindia.in
|
Veena Malik's Silk Sakkath Hot screening has been halted. A moralist campaigner has convinced a court stay the movie untill August 10. Bhimashankar Patil, the President of Karnataka Navnirman Sene, filed a petition to ban Silk Sakkath Hot
from screening. Patil claims that the film projects women in a bad taste, and that there are vulgar scenes in the movie in the name of sensuous sequences. The film supposedly sends a bad message to society and allowing such films for screening
will harm the society. He also claimed that the posters of the film are as bad as the movie, and it should be removed with immediate effect. Silk Sakkath Hot has been cleared by the local Regional Censor Board with an 'A' (Adult) certificate.
|
|
Punjab bans the film Sadda Haq
|
|
|
|
6th April 2013
|
|
| See article from
ndtv.com
|
A day before its release, the Chandigarh, Punjab and Haryana governments banned the film Sadda Haq as considered it to have glorified the Khalistan (separate Sikh homeland) movement and its leaders. The movie is based on events in Punjab
during 1980-90s and portrays alleged police torture and other inhuman practices that were reported during that period. Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal justified the ban saying the state government was committed to maintain peace and
harmony: It is our priority to maintain peace and communal harmony in the state... we don't want that the movie should vitiate the communal atmosphere of the state,
Meanwhile, in Amritsar, radical
Sikh outfit Dal Khalsa condemned the Punjab government for banning the film on frivolous charges and demanded a rethink on the move. According to reports, other protests were held against the film at Phagwara and Hoshiarpur on Friday.
Update: Unbanned but Cut 27th April 2013. See article from
tribuneindia.com India's Supreme Court has cleared the release of Punjabi movie Sadda Haq (Our Rights) in Punjab, Chandigarh and Delhi on the recommendations of a
four-member panel of senior advocates that watched it at a special screening in the court complex. A three-member Bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir passed an order asking the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to consider
revising the classification of the movie, based on the Khalistani movement in Punjab in the 1980s, from U (universal viewing) to A (restricted to adults) as recommended by the lawyers' panel. The Bench also asked the producers and
distributors of the movie not to make use of the controversial promotional song Baggi in any manner whatsoever. Update: Unbanned in Haryana 17th May 2013. See
article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com The Haryana government has lifted the ban on the exhibition of film 'Saada Haq' in the state subject to the condition that the
observations of Supreme Court and provisions of other applicable laws are compiled with in letter and spirit, a state government spokesperson said here. Only the duly corrected version having certification from Central Board of Film
Certification would be exhibited in full conformity to law, the spokesperson added.
|
|
Meanwhile Muslims bomb cinemas in protest at being depicted as terrorists
|
|
|
| 31st January 2013
|
|
| See article from
daijiworld.com
|
Vishwaroopam is a 2013 India crime action thriller by Kamal Hassan. With Kamal Hassan, Pooja Kumar and Andrea Jeremiah.
Muslims protesting against Kamal Haasan's film Vishwaroopam hurled
petrol bombs at two theatres in Tamil Nadu where the movie was scheduled to be screened on Wednesday following the High Court staying the ban imposed by the State Government. There are no reports of injuries. Glass panes at the theatres were shattered.
Meanwhile, Kamal Haasan met with representatives of the Muslim community and later told newspersons that he had come to an amicable settlement over the dispute that rose from his using verses from the Quran in Vishwaroopam:
This film is not against Indian Muslims. It is in support of Indian Muslims. There seems to be some confusion over the use of Quranic verses and I am willing to edit out these references. Meanwhile Madras High Court re-instates ban
The problems for Vishwaroopam increased after the Madras High Court Wednesday set aside the single judge's interim order that allowed screening of the film in the state. Hearing the appeal made by the Tamil Nadu government against the
single judge's order, a two-member high court bench set aside the former's order. The high court bench chaired by Justice Dharma Rao has nullified the revocation of the ban on the film by Justice K. Venkataraman Tuesday. Rao said:
The film stays banned as of now and it can't be screened across Tamil Nadu. Meanwhile the Vishwaroopam ban is unacceptable, says chief censor Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC)
chairperson Leela Samson says that the ban on Vishwaroopam is unacceptable: This is hounding of an artist, a man who is an icon of Tamil Nadu. We are sensitive to issues. The group objecting to 'Vishwaroopam'
have the freedom not to view it. We will object to the language used by the lawyer representing the Tamil Nadu government against the censor board. It is absolutely unacceptable. We have certified hundreds and thousands of films
but only with 'Vishwaroopam', people find, it has not been done with due diligence? This is an infringement on freedom of expression.
|
|
Malaysia joins Indian states in banning the Tamil spy thriller Vishwaroopam
|
|
|
| 30th
January 2013
|
|
| 27th January 2013. From niticentral.com See
article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com |
Vishwaroopam is a 2013 India crime action thriller by Kamal Hassan. With Kamal Hassan, Pooja Kumar and Andrea Jeremiah.
Kamal Haasan's controversial film Vishwaroopam has been banned from
local cinemas in Malaysia a day after its release following a directive from the Home Ministry, much to the disappointment ethnic Indians in Kuala Lumpur. Film distribution company Lotus Fivestar AV's director R Ramalingam said the ministry told
him to stop screening the movie on Friday. The film, which opened in Malaysia on Thursday, had played to full cinemas before being removed from the theatres. Vishwaroopam has been passed by the Central Board of Film Censors but has been
temporarily banned in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu for two weeks amid allegations by the Muslim community that they have been depicted negatively in the movie. Haasan has taken the matter to the Madras High Court and a decision is pending. The
film is playing in the state of Kerala but cinema goers are having to brave muslim protests. Sri Lanka has ordered a delay in the release in favour of a review by censors. In the UK the film has been passed 12A for cinema release after 11s
of category cuts. The BBFC commented: Company chose to remove two moments of bloody violence in order to obtain a 12A rating. An uncut 15 rating was available. VISHWAROOPAM is a thriller in the
Hindi and Tamil languages about a woman unsuspectingly married to one of India's top secret agents. It is rated 12A for moderate violence. There are a number of fast-paced fights and shoot-outs. Although there are some
heavy blows and bullet impacts, little is shown in terms of injury detail, with the focus instead placed on the spectacular and generally unrealistic fight choreography. For example, in one scene the hero uses a Japanese sword to defeat his attackers,
cutting off one of their hands. There is no detail of this but the hand is briefly seen flying through the air. VISHWAROOPAM also contains infrequent mild bad language and mild sex references. There is also some sight of hard
drugs, but this occurs within a clear anti drug context.
Presumably the baddies are muslim terrorists and hence the complaints about negative depictions from the muslim community. Update: Unbanned by the
Madras High Court 30th January 2013. See article from
thehindubusinessline.com
In a major relief to film makers, the Madras High Court has lifted the ban imposed on the movie Vishwaroopam by the Tamil Nadu government after it courted controversy over its supposedly anti-Muslim content. The judgement paves the way for
the screening of the movie however there are indications that the state government may prefer an appeal. The court reviewed and accepted the film censorship procedures resulting in the UA certificate (PG) issued after 1:08s of censor cuts.
The state's case seemed to be that the decision was taken by an examining committee rather than the full board. The Tamil Nadu government had banned the screening of the film in the face of opposition by some Muslim outfits, who claimed that the
movie portrayed their community in a negative light. It seems that this claim is due to the spy thriller baddies being fictional muslim terrorists. Update: Meanwhile in Milton Keynes 30th January 2013. From
miltonkeynes.co.uk
Angry Muslims staged a protest against a supposedly Islamophobic film outside Milton Keynes' Cineworld cinema. The group were protesting the UK release of the controversial Indian film Vishwaroopam , which is currently showing in British
cinemas. Campaigner Mustapha Zamaan felt the film fuelled negative views against Muslim people and should be banned from British cinemas. He said: We know there's a number of American films against Muslims but it's a
lot different in Indian culture, where they trust film actors like gods. This worship leads to films like this creating racial tension and that's why it's been banned in India. Ideally we want it pulled here too, but we might be a bit late.
We respect freedom of expression... BUT ...this film is hate speech that portrays Muslims negatively.
Update: Unbanned in Malaysia 21st February 2013. See
article from
jagranjosh.com The Malaysian Authorities on 19 February 2013 lifted the ban imposed on the screening of the Tamil movie Vishwaroopam , directed and produced by Kamal
Haasan for public screening. Earlier on 24 January 2013 the authorities approved the screening of the movie in Malaysia but following the directives released by the Home Ministry that the content of the movie portrayed Islam in a negative light,
the approval was withdrawn. The movie received a go-ahead in Malaysia after the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim) and the National Censorship Board studied the movie from all aspects including religious and security fronts and gave
a green signal to its screening.
|
|
Film producers appeal against the Indian film censor's ban of Sadda Haq
|
|
|
| 28th
January 2013
|
|
| From sikhsiyasat.net
|
Sadda Haq is a Punjabi movie that was banned by Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). It was reviewed by the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) on January 16, 2013. As per information shared by producer Kuljinder
Sidhu: FCAT has recommended few changes and they will review the film again on January 30th . Update: Unban confirmed 1st February 2013. From
hindustantimes.com Sadda Haq , a much-awaited Punjabi film dealing with the days of terrorism in Punjab, will witness a worldwide release in theatres on April 5 as
the censor board has lifted its ban on the movie. The Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) of the censor board gave the green signal to the film after four-month-long deliberations with the film production team and legal luminaries, the film's
producer-cum-writer Kuljinder Singh Sidhu said at a press conference: FCAT chairman Lalit Basin, in the presence of various members of the review committee, notified the censor board through a written notice that the
film is based on facts and gives a good social message, so there is nothing objectionable in it.
The Mumbai censor board had imposed a ban on the film, which was submitted to the board for its release on October 20, 2012. The ban was
imposed without any particular reason being cited, Sidhu said. On November 14, 2012, the film producer appealed to the review committee of the board, but the panel also banned the film, mentioning in its report that it presented a wrong picture of the
police and the government of that time. Sidhu acted on the comment saying: We have finally got the certification after minor changes dealing with the role of the police during that period.
|
|
Thrash metal rap musical about a young dopehead features real sex and is banned in its homeland of India
|
|
|
| 22nd June 2012
|
|
| See article from
guardian.co.uk by Nirpal Dhaliwal
|
The London Indian film festival is showcasing controversial new movies that are winning international acclaim but offending the establishment by exposing hypocrisies at home. The festival opened on Wednesday with Gangs of Wasseypur , a
two-part epic about criminal dynasties who control a mining town in the lawless state of Jharkand. With its raw potrayal of a reality that never appears in the glossy utopia of Bollywood, it heralds a movement towards exposing the hypocrisies of Indian
society about sex, drugs, development and injustice. The film has the audacity to reflect the folk bawdiness of Indian life, with song lyrics that have been translated as: You'll know my name when I fuck you dry ... Ain't I nice, I just fucked
you twice. You can almost taste the salt as the sweaty lovers frolic to the score. Also showing at the London festival is Gandu (variously translated as Arsehole, Wanker and Loser ), a thrash-metal rap musical about a
young dopehead and his lust for fame and sex that, despite being banned in India, has become one of the country's most talked about films, with its explicit opium smoking, foul language and masturbation. The confusion of a society in thrall to its
own ancient morals while increasingly experiencing the wider world is acutely captured in Gandu, whose eponymous hero is an angst-ridden skinhead who yearns to rap with Asian Dub Foundation while loafing and getting high on the streets of Calcutta. Shot
in black and white, it features a kung-fu-kicking rickshaw-wallah sidekick and an explicit blowjob scene performed by the director's girlfriend, followed by her squatting brazenly on the young man's face. The movie is a surreal Bengali mix of Jim
Jarmusch kookiness and the raw sexuality of Nagisa Oshima, and is absolutely nothing like any Indian film I've ever seen. Gandu Gandu, a thrash-rap musical. was banned in India. Leaked on the internet, Gandu has been downloaded more than a million
times and hawkers openly sell the DVDs. It is now getting government exemptions to be shown on the Indian festival circuit and has opened a serious debate on censorship.
|
28th January 2012 | | |
India bans The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
| See
article from
cinemablend.com
|
David Fincher's The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo features scenes of violence, rape, torture, nudity. All a bit too much for India's film censors have have banned it. India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) decided that the
movie contained too much nudity - five scenes to be exact. Now, according to Variety, distribution has been cancelled entirely because David Fincher refuses to cut the film. A spokesperson for Columbia Pictures in India said, The Censor Board
has adjudged the film unsuitable for public viewing in its unaltered form and, while we are committed to maintaining and protecting the vision of the director, we will, as always, respect the guidelines set by the board. The trade says that normally
nude scenes are simply blurred out, but the Censor Board specifically asked that scenes be cut out. No doubt Indians will now find a way to watch it just as the director intended.
|
26th August 2011 | |
| Caste sensitivity results in state bans of the Indian film Aarakshan
|
14th August 2011. See article from
desiblitz.com |
Aarakshan the Bollywood movie about the caste and education system in India has featured in a banning row with politicians from three states in India, despite the movie being passed by the censors. Prakash Jha's Bollywood film Aarakshan
attracted bans from three key states in India, namely, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh (UP) and Andhra Pradesh (AP). The opening weekend of the film had a restricted release due to politicians in the banning states feeling the film was insensitive to low-caste
Hindus by using objectionable terms. Aarakshan, translated as Reservation, is based on caste-orientated reservation in the Indian education system. Supposedly derogative references made to Dalits (formerly known as untouchables) in the film
instigated protest and vandalism of posters. Some Dalit groups are not happy with the casting of actor Saif Ali Khan (a Muslim royal) as a low-caste Hindu in the film. Prior to the release of the film it was reported that Prakash Jha's residence
and office were ransacked by activists of Republican Party of India (RPI). Reacting to the attack, Jha said: The censor board (Central Board of Film Certification) has cleared the film without a single cut and with a U/A certificate (Parental
Guidance). I am confident my film has examined the issue of reservation and caste divides with sensitivity. I don't understand why is everybody up in arms against my film. However, it's a democratic country, so everyone has a right to protest.
However, due to the media commotion surrounding the film and the move from Praksah Jha the director seeking the lifting of the bans at the Supreme Court, it's emerged that authorities in Punjab reviewed the film and the government panel lifted the ban
and similarity the same by Andhra Pradesh officials. Leaving the ban in UP outstanding. Update: Government don't want to get involved 16th August 2011. See
article from tribuneindia.com Defending the censor board's decision
to allow the film Aakarshan release, the Centre ruled out any scope for intervention in the matter. I am fully with the decision of the Censor Board.... My Ministry has no role in it, Information and Broadcasting Minister Ambika Soni
told reporters. To a question why the I & B Ministry was not intervening, Soni said: In the Cinematograph Act, there was some scope for intervention earlier. But in 2000, that right was taken away by the Supreme Court. As of today, the
Ministry has no right to intervene. She said the Central Board of Film Certification is an autonomous body and it had been reconstituted very recently. Update: Court judgement bans states from rethinking decisions made
by the national film censor 26th August 2011. From elegraph.co.uk
The Indian Supreme Court has ruled that state governments cannot ban a film, which has been cleared by the censor board for public screening, on the apprehension that it could cause a law and order problem. Clearing decks for release of Prakash
Jha's film Aarakshan in Uttar Pradesh, a bench of Justices M K Sharma and A R Dave said it was the state's duty to maintain law and order and quashed an order banning the film's screening for two months. The court said:
It is for the state to maintain law and order effectively and meaningfully. It said reservation as a social issue needs to be debated in every forum. We feel reservation is a social issue and in a vibrant democracy like ours, public
discussion is necessary. Such discussion on social issues bring about awareness for effective working of the democracy. Once an expert body has cleared a film, the state cannot go behind law and order situation to
stall its screening in theatres.
|
27th December 2010 | |
| Indian censor bans Inshallah Football
|
See
article from
kashmirdispatch.com
|
India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has banned Inshallah Football , a documentary film about an aspiring footballer who was denied the right to travel abroad on the pretext that father was a militant in the 1990s. The film's
director Ashvin Kumar said, This morning (December 23) I received a call from the Indian censor board stating that after having referred the film to a revision panel, censor certification will not be given. We have not been asked to make any cuts. The
reason given was that it spoke against the Indian government and that it was one-sided. The film has been critically acclaimed and won a Special Jury Distinction prize at the just-concluded Dubai International Film Festival.
|
14th November 2010 | |
| Satyajit Ray's Sikkim unbanned but not allowed to be shown
| From sify.com
|
Satyajit Ray's historic documentary Sikkim had its screening cancelled on Thursday at the Kolkata Film Festival (KFF) after being banned by a court order citing violation of copyright laws. A District Judge ordered the stay on a
petition by Atul Kaura, secretary of Art & Culture Trust of Sikkim, an NGO supposedly working for the preservation of ethnic Sikkimese art and culture. The film cannot be screened without our permission when the copyright is with us. Even
the censor certificates are with us, where we have been credited as the producers of the film, Ugyen Chopel, managing trustee of the body, said. Claiming exclusive possession of a sole 35 mm print and two DVD versions of the film, he alleged
that the film festival authorities were showing a pirated version of the documentary. We have cancelled all the screenings as of now. But we will challenge the decision in the court, KFF director Nilanjan Chatterjee said. The
52-minute documentary, commissioned by the last Chogyal (king) of Sikkim, Palden Thondup Namgyal, has remained shrouded in controversy ever since it was made by the Oscar winning director in 1971. The Chogyals first banned the film after a few scenes
went against their liking. When the Himalayan kingdom merged with India in 1975, the Indian government also banned it. In 2000, the copyright of the film was transferred to the Art and Culture Trust of Sikkim. A damaged print of the film was
restored by the Ganktok-based trust in 2002 with the support of The Academy of Motion Pictures, Art and Science in California.
|
26th October 2010 | |
| India's first gay film receives a substantial cuts list
|
9th October 2010. From hindustantimes.com |
Dunno Y.... Na Jaane Kyun has been refused a certificate from the Censor Board untill the cuts directed by the revising committee are incorporated into the final print. The film has been stuck for the last two months after the committee suggested
that the kissing and love-making related stories Scenes between actors Kapil Sharma and Yuvraj Parashar have to be snipped out. They also had strong objections to the nudity in the film. Kapil Sharma confirms the news and says that giving
in to the CBFC's demands would have been a major compromise. The scenes in question were essential to depict the romance between the two men. If the censors can allows kisses between hetrosexual lovers why should they be averse to those between
homosexual partners? he argues. Dunno YHe points out that homosexuality is legal now following the Supreme Court's ruling on article 377 last year. And says that they may move court if the revising committee doesn't change its decision.
We don't mind reducing the length of these scenes that are already blurred but editing them out is not an option. We've already made some cuts suggested by one of the previous committees. The LGBT community has promised to support them
should they move court. But we'd like to settle the matter amicably, says Sharma. Update: 40% Cuts on Appeal 26th October 2010. From
hindustantimes.com The Indian censor board has cut a lovemaking scene from Dunno Y… Na Jaane Kyon by about 40%. Another scene taken of a nude Yuvraj Parasher from
behind has been deleted. The first censor committee refused to pass. The revising committee (appeal board) also had problems with a kissing and lovemaking scenes, along with some dialogue. Parashar points out that a lot of it had to do with
the fact that the scenes features two men instead of a girl and a boy: We convinced them that the film is about love and not sex. And got away with 60% of the scenes intact. The actors have also been been getting pressure from a homophobic
organisation in Delhi over the last week warning them with dire consequences if the film was released. A complaint was lodged with the Khar Police Station last week. Says a petrified Parashar: Kapil and I are new to the film industry and don't want
these people to harm us before our career even takes off.
|
18th September 2010 | | |
India unbans Satyajit Ray's Sikkim
| Based on
article from bbc.co.uk
|
India has finally lifted the ban on a documentary film made on the Himalayan state of Sikkim by the legendary director Satyajit Ray, his family said. The film was banned after Sikkim merged with India under controversial circumstances in 1975.
It was made 40 years ago when Sikkim was an independent kingdom - Sikkim's last ruler Palden Thondup Namgyal commissioned the film to woo tourists. Ray died in April 1992 after receiving an Oscar for lifetime achievement. His son,
Sandip Ray, also a film-maker, told the BBC that he was delighted that the ban on the documentary - called Sikkim - had been lifted. When the film was completed, the king and his wife were reportedly furious - especially over a shot that
showed poor people scrambling for leftover food behind the royal palace in the capital, Gangtok. My father was asked to drop some shots and redo the final product, said Sandip Ray. He did that but the situation changed. By the time
the final cut emerged, Sikkim had been merged with Indian under rather controversial circumstances in 1975. Unsure how the people of Sikkim would react to the controversial shots in the film, the Indian government decided to ban Sikkim. Except
for a private screening by my father, the film has not been seen by anybody else, Ray said. The two existing copies of the film are in the US and the British Film Institute.
|
26th June 2010 |
| | Indian film censors ban Flames of the Snow
|
From nepalnews.com
|
The Indian Censor Board has refused public screening of Flames of the Snow , a documentary on Nepal stating the film elucidates about Maoist movement in Nepal and their ideology. The censors cited the recent Maoist violence in some parts of
India, said the producer of the film, Anand Swaroop Verma. The refusal for screening was a matter of surprise as the film does not have any reference at all to the current Maoist movement in India, said Verma, who is regarded an expert on Nepalese
affairs. The film highlights struggle of Nepalese against the monarchy, anarchic reign of Ranas and burial of kingship in the year 2008 when Nepal was declared a republic. I am submitting the film to revising committee of the Board, said producer Verma.
|
2nd December 2009 | | |
Indian film censors unban Renigunta after cuts
| Based on
article from sify.co
|
The controversial Paneerselvam directed Renigunta which was referred to Revising committee in Mumbai has now been cleared with an A certificate with cuts. The film was refused a censor certificate by the Regional Censor Board in
Chennai for showing violent and gruesome scenes enacted by children in graphic detail. A censor spokesperson said: The members who had recently watched the film congratulated the filmmaker for making an overpoweringly stunning film. The
film will now release in grandeur on December 4 . High Court bans Renigunta Based on
article from behindwoods.com Just
after the deadlock with Censor Officials in Chennai was cleared and the the film was cleared for screening by Mumbai censors, Uttam Chand, a financier who has financed the movie filed a petition in Chennai High Court seeking a ban on the movie's release
since the producers failed to pay off the debts. The Court, after hearing the petition, ordered the movie's screening to be withheld until the producers pay their debts Rs. 37 lakhs with 24% interest to financier Uttam Chand.
|
27th November 2009 | | |
Indian film censors ban Renigunta
| From
sify.co
|
The Tamil film Renigunta which was to be releases on Nov 27 has been refused a censor certificate by the Regional Censor Board in Chennai for showing violent and gruesome scenes enacted by children in graphic detail. The film as per
sources in the industry has now been referred to the Revising Committee in Mumbai. The subject of Renigunta shows children turning into contract killers. The film is directed by Panneerselvam and produced by Mahendra Kumar Jain.
|
10th January 2009 | | |
Maharashtra state ban on film Deshdrohi rescinded in court
| Based on
article from timesofindia.indiatimes.com
|
Bollywood may not have been very hot on Kamal Khan's Deshdrohi , but the industry certainly is very happy with the court's verdict that prevents the Maharashtra state from curbing a film-maker's freedom of expression.
Kamal Khan, the
producer-actor of the film, said, I am happy that the court has rapped the state by calling the ban illegal and said freedom of expression of a film-maker should not be curbed as the censor board has cleared the movie and given it a `U' certificate.
The court has also said the government misused Section 651 under the pretext that the film would cause law and order problem. He now plans to start the publicity for the film, which will be release on January 23.
Vinayak Azad, regional
officer, censor board, said, The film was cleared with a `U' certificate by the appellate tribunal. The state had imposed the ban and it's got nothing to do with us. Deshdrohi is a film based on north Indians migrating to Mumbai
which had created a controversy in the state. The Maharashtra government had imposed a two-month ban on the film fearing backlash from the Raj Thackeray-led Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and others if it was allowed to be released in the present
format.
|
18th November 2008 | |
| Indian state of Maharashtra bans film Deshdrohi
|
Based on article from
hindu.com
|
With Deshdrohi is a film based on north Indians migrating to Mumbai which has been creating a controversy in the Indian state of Maharashtra, Lok Janshakti Party leader and Union Minister Ram Vilas Paswan questioned the banning of the
film in the State despite getting Censor Board clearance: What is the harm in screening the film? It has got clearance from the Censor Board. No other State has banned it.
The Maharashtra government has imposed a two-month ban on the film
fearing backlash from the Raj Thackeray-led Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and others if it was allowed to be released in the present format.
The Maharashtra police had asked the film's writer, producer and actor Kamaal Khan for a separate
screening before the film's release.
The MNS has welcomed the ban on the film saying the movie had the potential for to create a law and order problem. Update: Still
Banned 18th November 2008. See article from dnaindia.com The Bombay high court on Monday refused to interfere with the state's order suspending the screening of the film. There was, however, a silver lining for
Khan as a division bench of Chief Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice Sharad Bobde asked principal secretary (home) to give a hearing to the film's producer and pass a fresh order by November 20.
|
24th February 2008 | |
| Jodhaa Akbar banned in Pradesh
|
From Apunka Choice
|
UTV Motion Pictures, producers of Jodhaa Akbar , said they have moved the Madhya Pradesh High Court to lift the ban on screening of the film in the state.
We will take the matter to the Supreme Court if need be, a UTV official said
in a statement.
The entire film industry, including producers, distributors and exhibitors are up in arms against the state government's order for suspension of the screening of the film, it said.
In fact, the MP exhibitors association
has threatened to go on an indefinite strike if this arbitrary ruling is not reversed, it added.
The authorities cannot let a small group of individuals dictate what is or is not acceptable for the consumption of the general public, the
official said: If we allow our creative freedom to be dictated by every potentially aggrieved party, then I am afraid we will not have as vibrant and creative industry in the future. We will fight till the end.
The film was banned in
Madhya Pradesh on February 22 after demonstrations against it by the Rajput community. The film relates the tale of a Rajput princess converting to Islam to marry Mughal emperor Akbar.
Meanwhile, the film was banned in Sonepat city and elsewhere
in the district on Saturday after demonstrations against it by the workers of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) at cinema theatres. Earlier the Ambala district administration had banned the screening of the movie.
|
| |