6th December | | |
Czech traffickers jailed
| Based on
article from thisiskent.co.uk
|
Traffickers have been jailed after bringing two women into the UK in June after persuading them to take part in sham marriages in the Republic of Ireland. The victims were then forced into prostitution and were driven to brothels throughout
England. The women's plight was discovered on June 24 whilst they were in Maidstone, after one victim persuaded a hotel manager to call police. Ivan Gujda admitted two charges of human trafficking for sexual exploitation within the UK and
was sentenced to three years in prison. Martin Brusch and Dusan Horvat pleaded guilty to the same charges and also to two of trafficking women into the UK for sexual exploitation. Both were sentenced to ten years in prison.
|
4th November | |
| Managers given suspended sentences
| Based on article from dailyrecord.co.uk
|
Two Surrey women received suspended jail terms after admitting running several brothels in Sussex. At Lewes Crown Court Ping Hylott was given a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years. Lihua Na was given a nine-month jail term, also
suspended for two years. Sussex Police said the pair had benefited from financially from several brothels in Sussex. The force said the two women were arrested in September after police raided brothels in Lewes and Horsham that had been
under surveillance. Hylott pleaded guilty to three charges of brothel keeping and one count of money laundering (ie just spending the money earned). Na admitted two counts of brothel keeping and one charge of money laundering on 5 October part way
through their trial. Update: Acquitted 20th March 2011. See
article from
redhillandreigatelife.co.uk Ping Hylott and Lihua Na appeared before Lewes Crown Court last October after an investigation by Sussex Police's Money Laundering
Team identified them as managing brothels in Horsham, Haywards Heath and Lewes. Hylott was given a 12-month sentence and Na received a nine month sentence, both of which were suspended for two years. A confiscation hearing under the
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 heard that Hylott had profited from the brothels to the value of £ 98,977.99. She was issued with a confiscation order for £ 12,840.13, with 28 days
to pay, together with a default sentence of six months on failure to pay the order. At a similar hearing on February 25, Na was issued with an order for £ 3,000 - with three months to pay, together with a
default sentence of two months on failure to do so - after the court heard she had benefited from her criminal activity by nearly £ 28,000. |
2nd November | | |
Ayr sex shop owners fined for selling mephedrone
| Based on article from dailyrecord.co.uk
|
Margaret McCracken was caught selling mephedrone in a trading standards sting at Body Style adult theme shop which she runs with her partner Frank Nicholson in Ayr. Until recently the drug mephedrone was sold as a legal high. McCracken
admitted that on November 13 last year she sold Moonshine bath salts containing mephedrone with a wicked disregard for the consequences . She also admitted she encouraged urging epople to take the drug, also known as M-cat, knowing it might cause
injury, mental health problems and death . Nicholson admitted offering Moonshine for sale. Sheriff Alan Miller fined McCracken £700 and Nicholson £550. |
19th October | | |
Woman given conditional discharge for allowing her house to be used for prostitution
| Based on article
from thenorthernecho.co.uk
|
A woman who allowed her home to be used as a brothel has been given a conditional discharge. Although the terraced house in Shildon, County Durham, was in the name of Carol Smith, it was accepted she made little profit from the venture. She
was arrested after a police inquiry into activities at the house in July, following a complaint understood to have been made by neighbours. Smith who agreed she allowed a friend to use the house for prostitution, was facing a potential prison
sentence of up to six months after admitting a charge of keeping a brothel when she appeared at Newton Aycliffe Magistrates' Court last month. The magistrates committed the case to be sentenced at Durham Crown Court. But, when the case was called
yesterday, Judge Christopher Prince immediately made it clear he would not impose a prison sentence: She has allowed a friend to use her premises for the purposes of prostitution and pleaded 'guilty' at the first opportunity. Although she has some
previous convictions there is nothing for some time or of this nature. I will impose a conditional discharge for 12 months and you must keep out of trouble for a year and you will hear no more about this. Smith has been subject to a proceeds
of crime financial inquiry since her guilty plea at the magistrates' court. But Rachel Masters, prosecuting, told yesterday's hearing: Having consulted the financial investigator in this case it would appear she has no assets and I don't think it's in
the public interest to pursue a confiscation order.
|
6th October | | |
Owner of unlicensed shop in Bournemouth fined
| Based on
article from bournemouthecho.co.uk
|
A sex shop owner has been fined £3,000 for trading without the proper licence. He was ordered to pay the full council costs of £3,878 and the mandatory £15 victim surcharge. Wayne MacGowan ran a shop called 18+ on Bournemouth's Holdenhurst Road.
He pleaded guilty to three counts of trading without a licence at Bournemouth Magistrates Court. Police and council officers searched the shop in November 2009 and found 727 hardcore pornographic DVDs. The DVDs were a mix of R18-rated films, which
can only be sold in sex shops, and unclassified films. They also found sex toys and a substantial number of magazines – the total retail value was £21,789. MacGowan closed the shop at the weekend and it would not open again . His defence said he did not know at the time he needed a licence and there were other unlicensed shops in the area.
Tom Horder, defending, said: It seems that a picture was created that there was a degree of toleration. He also said that what made a sex shop was unclear, adding: When you look at Ann Summers, the line becomes less clear. As far as the
defence knows none of them are licensed. They sell sex toys, lingerie and pornographic films.
|
5th October | | |
Owner of unlicensed shop in Kings Cross fined
| Based on
article from thelondondailynews.com
|
Maria O'Sullivan has been fined over £35,000 for running an illegal sex shop in Kings Cross. She was prosecuted by Islington council for owning and operating the unlicensed business on York Way. Pirate Bookshop is owned by Ballaction London
Ltd, where O'Sullivan is the sole director. She was ordered by Highbury Magistrates to pay fines and costs totalling £35,360. Caledonian Ward Councillor Paul Convery said: I am very pleased that the Council's case has been
successful. For nearly 5 years, we have repeatedly called for legal action against unlicensed sex shops in Kings Cross. The first step in ridding the area of it's vice reputation is to get rid of every vice-related business, particularly the ones that
refuse to be licensed by the local authority. Our policy is simple – zero tolerance against all types of sleazy and illegal sex related activities. The company was fined £17,500 plus £2,830 costs and £15 victim support surcharge and Maria
O'Sullivan was personally fined £15,000 plus £15 victim support surcharge. Maria O'Sullivan's son is the world class snooker player, Ronnie O'Sullivan.
|
8th September | | |
Sentences for 4 involved in the operation of a brothel
| Based on article
from stalbansreview.co.uk
|
Two madames, a maid, and a book keeper have been sentenced for their part in running a brothel in Hatfield, which made £170,000 in six months. The enterprise in Salisbury Square was shut down by police following an raid in November last
year. Katrina Baker and Valentina Janutiene were said to have set up the brothel, St Albans Crown Court. They were assisted by Janutiene's fiance, Anthony Andrew, who helped the pair with his accounting and book keeping skills. The fourth person
in the dock was the maid Sharon Kerrigan, described by Judge John Plumstead as an old prostitute . Baker, Janutiene and Kerrigan all appeared for sentencing having admitted a charge of keeping a brothel for prostitution. Andrew appeared for
sentence having been found guilty by a jury of the same charge. Neil King, prosecuting, described the set up police found as a well run, professional and tidy brothel . At the house at the time were two professional ladies wearing
silk dressing gowns and Kerrigan who was working as a brothel maid. A police investigation discovered Baker had placed advertisements in local papers advertising a massage parlour. More paperwork was discovered that showed prostitutes could keep
50 per cent of their takings with the other half going to those running the brothel. Passing sentence Judge Plumstead said had there been any sign that women working at the brothel had been trafficked then the sentences would have
been harsher. The judge said that while women could choose to prostitute themselves what they could not do was to set up brothels: It commercialises and exploits those who are willing to prostitute themselves for the benefit of others, Baker and Janutiene were both given a six-month prison sentence suspended for two years and ordered to carry out 100 hours of unpaid work. The pair were also made the subject of a Prohibitive Activity Requirement forbidding them to engage in prostitution for the next six months.
Andrew was sentenced to four months in jail suspended for two years and told he must pay £2,800 towards the cost of the trial and a further £500 towards his defence costs. Kerrigan was given a two-year conditional discharge.
|
7th September | | |
Sex shop owner prosecuted for selling previously 'legal highs'
| Based on
article from heraldscotland.com
|
A sex shop owner has admitted selling bath salts containing the recently banned drug mephedrone. Margaret McCracken, who part owns the Body Style adult theme shop in the Ayr's Burns Statue Square, faced a total of five mephedrone-related charges
at Ayr Sheriff Court. The Crown accepted her not guilty pleas to four of the charges. But she admitted that on November 13 last year with a wicked disregard for the consequences she sold Moonshine bath salts containing mephedrone,
encouraging ingestion and exposing the public to the possibility of injury, mental health problems and death . The other owner, Fran Nicholson, still faces all five charges and the case against him was continued until September 30. The
charges include selling Moonshine bath salts or plant food, containing mephedrone, to an undercover female trading standards officer on November 13 and encouraging her to ingest it. Sentence has been deferred on McCracken until September 30.
Ayr MP Sandra Osborne said: It is pleasing that the police here are treating this with the seriousness it deserves. The former Labour Government made mephedrone illegal in April this year.
|
7th September | |
| Another victim of the animal porn ban
| Based on
article from
chroniclelive.co.uk
|
effery Gray has been given a suspended jail sentence after police found a CS spray, a stun gun and animal pornography at his home. The court heard how officers found the items when they raided the man's flat. Jim Hope, prosecuting, said:
The stun gun is described as being of the appearance of a torch with two metal prongs, and two buttons, one for the light and the other to operate a gun. Also recovered from the bedroom was a DVD disc. When police viewed the footage they found
an extreme 22-minute pornographic film. Judge Beatrice Bolton said she had been appalled by the film: I have seen it and it's pretty disgusting . It's pretty extreme and particularly unpleasant and I don't know who it is that gets any
sexual satisfaction out of this. Gray was given a 12-week prison sentence, suspended for two years for the weapons charges and seven days for the porn, to run concurrently. In sentencing, Judge Bolton added: What led you to keep hold
of this property, I don't know. You now have a record after a great deal of Army service and an unblemished character.
|
17th August | | |
Couple jailed for running brothels with enslaved sex workers
| Based on article
from getsurrey.co.uk
|
A man and woman who enslaved sex workers via debt bondage have both been jailed. Michael Dalton and Nikki Chen brought in women from Asia to work in the four brothels that they operated over a six-year period, including one in Egham. They owned
properties in Gloucestershire and Surrey, as well as luxury Mercedes and Lamborghini sports cars, all bought with the proceeds of their crimes. On August 5 at Croydon Crown Court, Dalton was sentenced to three years for control of prostitution for
gain, and Chen to two-and-a-half years for the same offence. Dalton also received concurrent 21 and 18-month terms for, respectively, conspiracy to traffick within the UK for sexual exploitation and money laundering offences [ie spending their
ill-gotten gains] under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Chen's concurrent sentences were 18 months and two years. Chen has already surrendered £250,000 while the amount Dalton is to repay will be determined at a future hearing. Officers
working on the Metropolitan Police's Operation Icefall observed at least a dozen customers visiting each of the brothels every day between October 2008 and July 2009. The minimum payment for services from prostitutes working in the premises was £60,
ranging up to £120 per hour. Another man, Manjit Singh was given a 12-month jail term, suspended for two years, on July 8. He admitted conspiracy to traffick within the UK for sexual exploitation and was also handed a community order to carry out
300 hours of unpaid work. Singh was involved in the transportation of prostitutes to and from the premises. Ian Garrett received an 18-month prison sentence in July after admitting the same charge as Singh. Garrett was seen carrying luggage for
women who had been trafficked from South East Asia as they were taken to the brothels. Case officer Detective Constable Christopher Ansell said: The investigation revealed that some of the women were in debt bondage ranging from £25,000
upwards.
|
15th August | | |
Fined for being receptionist and renting room to sex worker
| Based on
article from
dunfermlinepress.com
|
A woman who performed reception duties for a prostitute working out of a Dunfermline flat has been fined £500. Elana Angulo, who claimed her work as a dominatrix was a a trade of humiliation that did not provide sexual services, was
found guilty of knowingly permitting a flat to be used as a brothel or for the purposes of habitual prostitution. Angulo was also convicted of, for the purpose of gain, exercising control, direction or influence over the movements of a prostitute,
namely Louise Thomas, and directing her in such a manner to aid and abet or compel her prostitution, in that she did knowingly permit her to carry out sexual favours for money and then profit from the payments made for the same. Sheriff Ian Dunbar
had previously heard Thomas admit to working as a prostitute at the flat where she would provide sexual favours to men for between £10 and £50. Thomas admitted she would pay Angulo a small amount of money for the rental of the room and that she would use
whatever money she earned from providing sex and a massage to clients to pay her bills. Thomas said, Ms Angulo would be there too and she would answer the phone. She would give my description, tell whoever called where the flat was and when
they planned to come to the flat. She would then let me know when people were coming. In passing sentence, Sheriff Dunbar said, I am quite satisfied that the premises were habitually used for prostitution, you were aware what Ms Thomas was
doing and profited financially. I do accept that you were not involved in compelling anyone to become involved in this, but the fact is you provided accommodation for these acts, placed adverts and provided reception duties at the flat.
|
11th August | | |
Year long prosecution dropped for two bad taste jokey video clips
| See article from
theregister.co.uk by Jane Fae Ozimek
|
A stunning reversal for police and prosecution in North Wales. A case, scheduled to be heard in Mold Crown Court, was the culmination of a year-long nightmare for Andrew Hollan as the CPS declined to offer any evidence, and he left court a free man.
The saga began last summer when, following a tip-off, police raided Holland's home looking for indecent images of children. They found none, but they did find two clips, one involving a woman purportedly having sex with a tiger, and one which is
believed to have depicted sado-masochistic activity between adults. Despite Holland's protests that he had no interest in the material, and that it had been sent to him unsolicited as a joke , he was charged with possessing extreme porn. In
a first court appearance in January of this year, the tiger porn charge was dropped when prosecuting counsel discovered the volume control and at the end of the action heard the tiger turn to camera and say: That beats doing adverts for a
living. The clip was therefore deemed to be unrealistic and out of scope as far as extreme porn legislation was concerned. The court then turned its attention to the allegedly more serious clip involving adult interaction which,
it has been suggested, featured some seriously unpleasant application of sharp objects to genitals. Holland spoke to members of Consenting Adult Action Network and sexual rights organisation Backlash, and he ended up pleading not guilty. He was
expected to call several expert witnesses who would have challenged the characterisation of the clip as pornographic , arguing instead that the content was intended to be a form of extremely bad taste joke and not sexual in nature. The CPS,
however, declined to offer any evidence, and the matter is at an end. We spoke to Holland after the case and he declared himself very relieved. Due to the sexual nature of the case, he has been barred from contact with his daughter since the case
began and he is now determined to re-establish contact. He told us: Now I can start to put my life back together. The CPS has not yet commented on this matter, or on the fact that on each charge, it was not until the day of the court
appearance that it decided the evidence to hand was inadequate. ...Read the full article And a reminder of the law
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 Section 63 Possession of extreme pornographic images
It is an offence for a
person to be in possession of an extreme pornographic image which is both— (a) pornographic, and (b) an extreme image.
An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
... Proceedings for an offence under this section may not be instituted—
(a) in England and Wales, except by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions Short jokey bad taste porn clips are clearly produced for the purpose of amusement or even disgust but
they are simply not produced for sexual arousal. DPP Keir Starmer should be ashamed of his persecution of an innocent man.
|
7th August | | |
Dangerous Pictures victim sentenced to 200 hours of community service
| Surely the video clip was extracted with the intention of being a bad taste joke. Therefore the clip is simply not an extreme
pornographic image. Who in their right mind would assume that it was to produced principally for the purpose of sexual arousal? Only nasty minded law enforcement jobsworths I think.
Section 63 Possession of extreme pornographic images
(2) An “extreme pornographic image” is an image which is both— (a) pornographic, and (b)
an extreme image.
(3) An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose
of sexual arousal.
Thanks to emark Based on article from sunderlandecho.com
|
A man caught with a jokey bad taste video on his mobile was warned by a judge he could have faced jail. Police found the short video clip on Michael Nelson's mobile after he was arrested and taken to Gill Bridge police station in Sunderland. The
footage showed a man's genitals being mutilated and had been on his phone for several months, a court heard. Perhaps this was just the well circulated video showing a woman's stiletto heel being ground into a guys dick. This clip is probably
languishing forgotten in the inbox of thousands of people. Persecutor Jeanette Smith told Sunderland Magistrates' Court that the 23-year-old blamed peer pressure, telling police the images were going about the streets , but he did not know
who had sent them to him. He said at first he could not delete it, but accepted later he could have deleted it, but pressure from friends made him keep it on his phone, she added. Nelson admitted to an offence of possessing extreme
pornography at a court hearing in June. Defence solicitor Geoff Pearson said Nelson, who has no previous convictions, did not forward the clip on to anyone and had no other hardcore pornography on his phone. Pearson said: This is an image that
was sent to him on his phone by an individual. He did not invite it and he has not done anything with it in the sense he did not distribute it. It just sat on his phone for a long time. He added: The images are pretty awful, I have to
accept that and he accepts that. I can't imagine why you would want to watch this, unless you were the particular type of person that found some gratification in it. He is, or he was, a young man of impeccable character and this is not the
kind of matter he was seeking or gets any gratification from. If only he had pressed the delete button, but it may have been peer pressure that caused him not to do so and got him into this trouble. District Judge Roger Elsey ordered Nelson to
complete 200 hours of unpaid work. He said: There is no doubt that this was a revolting and perverted piece of video and there is no reasonable explanation for this being on your mobile for the time it was. If you had any previous convictions
or you had distributed this piece of video, you would be going to prison. Nelson was also ordered to pay £85 towards court costs.
|
19th July | |
| Sentenced to 9 years for a running a well managed brothel
| 17th July 2010 |
Cuddles first hit the news in 2006 after a mass police raid with claims of trafficking and 'rescued' girls. The Scotsman reported: Nineteen women believed to have been locked up and forced to
become sex slaves have been freed by police after a raid on a massage parlour.
Fifty officers from West Midlands Police, including 25 women, stormed the premises on Thursday evening and arrested two men and a woman who are believed to be the
managers. A sawn-off shotgun and three extendable batons were found on the premises, which has an electric fence at the rear.
The girls, who come from Greece, Latvia, Turkey, Poland, Italy, Japan and Hong Kong, were also questioned by police with
the help of interpreters.
Police were looking into allegations that they were brought to this country after being promised jobs as nannies and waitresses, and said that immigration officers had been informed.
Detective Inspector Mark
Nevitt of West Midlands Police led the operation at the massage parlour. He said: Cuddles massage parlour was targeted as part of intelligence gathered through Operation Strikeout, which targets robberies and violent crime. We
went to the property to execute a warrant in human trafficking, and intelligence suggests the girls were brought into the country under false pretences, sold on and held against their will. These girls could be subject to violence, sexual assaults and
forced to work as prostitutes. There were 19 women in there in total and they were obviously very distressed so the female officers also helped to calm them down,"
Of course by the time it came to court in 2008
it transpired that the women weren't coerced or trafficked at all, but were working voluntarily for a well-managed brothel. Manager Susan Richards was jailed for 6 months and owner Carl Pritchett was jailed for two years. Both were also ordered to
repay the proceeds of their 'crimes'. Police Payback Team Based on
article from
sundaymercury.net Carl Pritchett who ran a brothel at Cuddles Massage Parlour in Birmingham has now been jailed for a further seven years for failing to pay back £2m
he made from the venture. Syed Askari, of the Crown Persecution Service, said: The CPS and our partners in the criminal justice system are committed to taking cash out of crime. In enforcing confiscation orders we will
robustly pursue defaulters and seek activation of the default sentence by the court where there is wilful non-compliance. John Barker, from West Midlands Police Central Payback Team, said: Carl Pritchett was made
subject of a £2million confiscation order in September 2009. That order was based upon money Pritchett had made, and conceded he had made from prostitution. He was given time to pay, but failed to do so. That
failure resulted in him being jailed for seven years. Despite the term of imprisonment, enforcement of the order will continue until it has been paid in full. Orders made under the Proceeds of Crime Act do not go away and cannot be ignored.
Comment: Legalised Theft 19th July 2010. Thanks to Alan I think Susan Richards actually got a suspended sentence, and was later threatened with a further fifteen
months if she didn't cough up her proceeds of crime . It was clear that she could only do so by selling her house. How the absurd rug-headed twats who issue these orders sleep at night I really don't know. Meanwhile, just down the road in Dudley,
a prostitutes' maid earning not much above the minimum wage has got a suspended sentence for involvement in managing a brothel . The Cuddles case is interesting. At first glance, it looks as if the Sherlocks of the West Midlands vice squad
took two and a half years to work out that a massage parlour called Cuddles was a knocking shop. I'd be surprised if it took me two and a half seconds! I have nasty sneaking suspicion that this is yet another case of the pound signs lighting up in
Mr Plod's eyes at the prospect of getting a share of the proceeds of crime . Since Plod got to keep some of the dosh, the number of raids on brothels has increased. There has been at least one case down south of a brothel, quietly and sensibly
tolerated for years by the local police, who even gave advice on security cameras, being raided after this absurd and iniquitous legislation came in. Sold to cretinous MPs as taking ill-gotten gains off fraudsters and robbers, it has been
disproportionately used against tarts and their maids, with the odd pimp thrown in.
|
18th July | | |
Another top-up dangerous pictures conviction
| Based on article from
stamfordmercury.co.uk
|
A man has been jailed after being caught with a photo of a man having sex with a squid. A court heard the sea creature was clearly dead in the picture, and a man is seen having sexual intercourse with it. (beware, candidate pictures
can be easily found on Google Images) Prosecutors amended the charge when it was admitted it could have been an octopus. Andrew Dymond was charged with possessing an image of someone performing an act of intercourse with a dead animal,
namely an octopus/squid, which was grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character . He pleaded guilty to a total of 25 porn charges, including possessing child porn and photographic images featuring other animals. Dymond was jailed for a total of four months. He was also banned from having any contact with children under the age of 16 and put on the sex offenders register for seven years.
|
4th July | | |
|
Convictions stand under non-enforceable VRA See
article from ukhumanrightsblog.com
|
23rd June | |
| Dangerous porn victim cleared over pictures found in browser cache
| See article from
theregister.co.uk by Jane Fae Ozimek
|
| A man's got to know his technical limitations |
A former stand-up comic was charged with six offences of possessing extreme porn featuring dodgy goings-on between humans and animals. The man denied the charges which, it was alleged, had been committed in May 2009. For the prosecution, Kent
Online reports, Alex Wilson told the judge at Maidstone Crown Court last Tuesday that, following discussions with an expert, he would offer no further evidence as he believed there was no realistic prospect of conviction. The judge entered formal
not guilty verdicts. A CPS spokesperson told us: It was also apparent from the evidence that the defendant was not computer literate. At the time the defendant's computer was seized the material was held in the computer's internet cache. There
was no evidence that the defendant had saved the images or sought to keep them. In order to 'possess' the images in that state the law requires knowledge that the images exist and the means or know-how to retrieve them. The defendant was in
possession of the images at the point in time that he accessed them and viewed them. On the evidence available in this case it was not possible to prove that he did so at some time after the Act came into force. We could not therefore proceed with the
prosecution and we accordingly offered no evidence. Simply deleting an image will not save you if you are computer literate enough to retrieve it. Contrariwise, it appears that if you are a total computer illiterate, that might be enough to
get you out of a fix. ...Read the full article Comment: Punishing the Not Guilty
From Harvey Yet again we find a person charged and hauled into court only to find the prosecution offer no evidence. NO EVIDENCE.
I wish judges would be more condemning of prosecutors for bringing charges before looking to
check that the evidence stacks up as it seems to be happening more frequently. And the CPS fuckwits who do decide to prosecute should be named so we can see who they are and whether they are just dumb or are serial offenders. No surprise that this was,
yet again, Kent police and prosecutors, who have form when it comes to "enhancing" the evidence, prosecuting first and asking questions later. |
15th June | | |
10 years for rape and coercion into prostitution
| Based on article from
times-series.co.uk
|
A Romanian pimp who lured a young girl to the UK before raping her and forcing her to work as a prostitute has been jailed for ten years in prison. Cezar Murariu befriended the 18-year-old, dubbed Natalya, in northern Romania last summer and
promised her a job in London, buying her a ticket to the UK. However, when she arrived he took her to a flat in Cricklewood where he raped the girl, who was a virgin, and then took her to another flat and forced her to work as a prostitute. She
was told by Murariu he would tell her family she was uncontrollable and voluntarily working as a prostitute unless she complied. However, she managed to send a text message to her family telling them she was in trouble and they contacted
London police who arrested Murariu. Yesterday Murariu was founbd guilty of rape and two counts of controlling prostitution for gain at Southwark Court, and sentenced to ten years in prison.
|
16th May | |
| Women caught running a brothel not jailed but put up for a mega-confiscation order
| Based on article from telegraph.co.uk
|
Two women who ran a brothel which earned almost £500,000 were told by a judge that it was a model for how such a business should be run if it was ever made legal. Monika Campbell and Lisa Gaskin ran the 133 Club in Leeds under the
guise of a luxury massage parlour between March 2005 and September last year. Leeds Crown Court heard that the pair were meticulous in their running of the business keeping accounts, reliably paying income tax and rates and arranging for health
advice and condoms for the women using the premises. Sentencing the pair, Judge Scott Wolstenholme said that there was no exploitation of the employees or nuisance to the public and if brothels were ever legalised it may be the way you were
running this business may be the model of how it should be done. However, he added: The fact is, it is illegal. Parliament has not legalised brothel keeping. You knew it was illegal but carried on making a good living out of it and here you
are now in the crown court. The judge said that he did not see the need to jail them, particularly as they would be facing draconian confiscation proceedings and they were given a 12-month community order with 50 hours unpaid work. Judge Wolstenholme told them the confiscation hearing fixed for September would mean they would end up having all your realisable assets seized where appropriate.
|
18th February | | |
Another victim of the Dangerous Pictures Act
| Based on article from
getsurrey.co.uk
|
A man has been fined for possessing extreme pornographic images featuring women, horses and dogs. Matthew Jones pleaded guilty in January to four counts of possessing 188 images on DVDs and a laptop. He was fined £1,000 at Guildford
Crown Court. Laura Plant, prosecuting, told the court that the man had in his possession both still and moving images downloaded from the internet. She added: It's mostly horses and dogs I'm told, and adult females having intercourse with them
or performing oral intercourse on the animals. The court heard that police discovered the images on a laptop and DVDs under a bed after they carried out a search of Jones's house on March 4 last year. In addition to the scenes of
bestiality, there were also pictures described in court as being of an extreme sadistic nature likely to cause injury to body parts, and images depicting severe bondage and extreme piercing. Richard McConaghy, defending, said possession of
the images had become a criminal offence just over a month before they were seized. He added: While it appears some of these images were downloaded in this gap, the majority of them were things he had for longer within his possession. Most part of the
criminality comes from not disposing of these images. Before sentencing, Judge Michael Addison viewed some of the pictures. He told Jones: These are serious offences because the making of images of these sort must be discouraged.
Update: Back Up Charges 19th February 2010. See
article from getsurrey.co.uk , Thanks to Harvey
The Dangerous Pictures charges seem to be back-up charges after the court ordered that the guy should be cleared of child porn charges (perhaps due to no evidence).
|
7th February | | |
Couple jailed for running brothels than included trafficked girls
| Based on article from
guardian.co.uk |
A couple have been jailed today after running a prostitution business using girls trafficked from Nigeria. Thomas Carroll an Irishman, and Shamiela Clark his South African wife, controlled their multimillion-pound business from Castlemartin,
Pembrokeshire. Among the prostitutes were six trafficked girls, aged from 15 to 21, some of whom had been terrified into working for fear of breaking a juju oath they were forced to take during voodoo ceremonies in Nigeria. Carroll
was jailed for seven years, and Clark for three and a half years, at Cardiff crown court, after both admitted conspiracy to control prostitution for gain and conspiracy to 'money-launder' (ie use ill-gotten gains). Carroll's daughter, Toma, was
imprisoned for two years after admitting 'laundering' the profits which, in one year totalled more than £800,000. The couple ran more than 35 brothels, mainly in the Irish Republic, from the rented Welsh farmhouse to which they fled after
coming to the attention of the gardaí. The Nigerian women and girls, who were not trafficked by the defendants, were among prostitutes supplied to the ring. One girl was 15 when placed in one of the Carroll brothels. Of the 15
prostitutes caught in the police raids on Carroll's brothels, some were from South America and Europe and willingly worked for him. Some of the 6 trafficked women lived in fear of juju oaths, made during terrifying and humiliating rituals
they were forced into by traffickers. An important part of the oath was each was told they had to pay back, on average, £65,000 to their traffickers. If they breached the oath, they would die, or their families back in Nigeria would die. Investigations continue to track down those responsible for trafficking them out of Nigeria and those passing them through Europe to Ireland.
Sentencing the defendants, judge Neil Bidder, told them: I'm not sentencing you for trafficking those women and accept you were unaware of the personal circumstance of the women who worked in your brothels and you were not responsible for any
violence and threats of violence. But the Nigerian women who were threatened with dreadful coercion all ended up working for you. You did not ask and did not care what personal tragedies had befallen those women submitting for your profit. The
couple will now be subject to confiscation proceedings to seize the proceeds of their crime. Update: Confiscated 5th June 2010. See
article from
westerntelegraph.co.uk Haverfordwest magistrates have confiscated over £17,000 from a father and daughter convicted of money laundering, conspiracy to money
launder and to control prostitution. Update: Appeal Rejected 26th October 2010. See
article from milfordmercury.co.uk
The man who headed a family-run chain of brothels around Ireland and Wales has failed to convince top judges his seven-year jail term was excessive. Thomas Joseph Carroll was jailed at Cardiff Crown Court after admitting conspiracy to
control prostitutes and launder money. Lord Justice Hooper, sitting with Mr Justice Butterfield and Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, remarked on the hefty scale of Carroll's vice operation, which reaped turnover topping 1million euros in one financial
year. He was behind 35 brothels in Northern and southern Ireland, the court heard, and must have been well aware of the climate of fear under which the women worked. His sentence was not manifestly excessive , the judge concluded,
dismissing Carroll's appeal. Update: Money Grabbing 20th March 2011. See article from
bbc.co.uk Thomas Carroll who ran an international prostitution ring has been told to hand over nearly £ 2m of his criminal profits or
face another 10 years in jail. He will have to sell four Welsh houses, three South African houses and four cars, including two Mercedes. He is serving a seven-year term for vice and money laundering offences. Judge Neil Bidder QC at
Cardiff Crown Court ruled Carroll's assets were purchased with the proceeds of crime.
|
2nd February | |
| European Court asked whether a sex shop video booth counts as a cinema for VAT purposes
| Based on article from
yorkshirepost.co.uk |
The owner of a Belgian sex shop posed a puzzler for European judges yesterday – does a coin-in-the-slot peep show count as a cinema? If it does, then it qualifies for reduced-rate VAT under EU tax rules. Belgium's tax authorities say the
cubicles for private film viewing at the Erotic Centre in Bruges are an automated recreation device , and the owner must pay VAT at the normal rate of 21% instead of 6% for a cinema. Lawyers for the owner told a hearing in the European
Court of Justice in Luxembourg that cinemas are explicitly identified as a cultural exception under EU VAT rules and only attract the lower VAT rate applied to normal cinemas in Belgium. The exact question posed to the EU court in
legal documents asks: Should a cubicle consisting of a lockable space where there is room for only one person and where this person can watch films on a TV screen for payment, where this person personally starts the film projection by inserting a coin
and has a choice of different films, and during the time paid for can continually modify his/her choice of projected films, be regarded as a 'cinema'? The three-judge panel is not expected to make a site visit, and their verdict, which could
affect peep show operators across Europe, is expected later this year.
|
|
|