|
US TV now allows the use of the word 'pussy' as long as it is in a politically correct context
|
|
|
| 12th November 2014
|
|
| See article from
bustle.com See The p-word the New York Post just
could not bear to use... from theguardian.com
|
Amy Schumer has revolutionized US television, and most people didn't even notice. Comedy Central approved the use of the word pussy on the network. The seemingly casual announcement of the un-bleep is actually a huge, huge victory. However
the 'victory' appears to have been won simply because Schumer is on the right side of the politically correct divide. She uses the word appropriately unlike the great unwashed. bustle.com
explains: Inside Amy Schumer aggressively attacks several women's issues, from body-shaming to sexual assault in the military, so it's important to be able to use such language. Much of the language banned
by the FCC is engendered, so not only is it a victory for Comedy Central but for the (hopefully) eventual equality for language on television. (Bear with me, because this post is gonna get profane).
iAccording to the FCC, most of the
language deemed obscene and inappropriate for television are lewd and sexual in context: It is a violation of federal law to air obscene programming at any time. It is also a violation of federal law to air indecent programming or profane
language during certain hours. On the list of prohibitions, besides pussy are several synonyms for a woman's vagina. You CAN say vagina on television, however. Though dick used to be on the list, it's now allowed on network television.
Some of the milder euphemisms are still banned, such as snatch, pink , twat, and clit. Though cock is also on the no-no list, there are way more words referring the female anatomy that are not allowed to be uttered
without a bleep, then those referring to a man's. bustle.com then takes time to explain a few of the basics of political correctness: Language
is so important and powerful, and now especially, what can and cannot be said on television and web-produced shows is becoming more influential on common vernacular. Even though Comedy Central airs such subversive shows like Inside Amy Schumer, Key and
Peele, The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, they still have to align to certain guidelines. And because the list of banned words contains so many alternatives for the word vagina, it creates and maintains the stigma and demonization related to a
woman's body. That's why serious attention should be paid Schumer's very funny show; she's subverting boundaries and slowly revolutionizing the language. The more artists and comedians like Schumer can change the conversation that
makes the language of female sexuality as neutral as the language about men's sexuality, the better. Hopefully more networks will follow suit.
|
|
China announces further restrictions for internet TV
|
|
|
| 6th September 2014
|
|
| See article from
sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com |
The Chinese government's TV and internet censor has announced further repressive controls for internet TV. The State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television (SARFT), issued a notice saying that video websites must obtain one
of two licenses -- a film screening license or a television screening license -- to legally stream foreign films or television shows. The regulator said the websites must register information about their foreign films and television shows by March
31 next year. The sites will not be able to broadcast such content after that date if they have not registered. According to Xinhua , the state-run news agency, the notice means that video websites will have to apply for a license for each
individual film or show, in addition to having to procure a license for the website overall to provide video streaming service. But SARFT said it encouraged online entertainment providers to import an appropriate amount of cinema and television
works that are healthy, well-made and showcase good values. |
|
Reg Bailey calls for UK TV programmes to be rated as per film classifications
|
|
|
| 5th
May 2014
|
|
| See
article from
dailymail.co.uk |
Reg Bailey, censorship campaigner and chief executive of the Mothers' Union, who 'advises' Downing Street on the sexualisation and commercialisation of childhood, has called for the introduction of a cinema-style ratings system for all broadcast
content. He insisted the rise in time-shifted viewing of TV -- on the internet or other catch-up services -- meant the old 9pm watershed could not survive in its current form: If you go to the age-rated
system -- 12, 12A, PG -- it is simpler and has a high trust level.
Figures show ten% of all television viewing is now time-shifted rather than live. Vivienne Pattison, director of campaign group Mediawatch-UK, said:
I am the parent of a seven-year-old who has no concept of linear television. He has no idea of not watching when he wants to watch. If you have a young teenage audience at 6.30pm and then you put out a version with extra
spicy bits later at night -- well, who do you think that is aimed at?
She suggested curious youngsters were using catch-up services to watch shows as Channel 4's The Joy of Teen Sex and My Daughter the Teenage Nudist, as well as the
post-watershed spin-off of the soap opera Hollyoaks. Tony Close, director of content standards at Ofcom, said: The TV watershed is an important way to protect children. We recognise the growth
of on-demand TV viewing poses new challenges. We are working with government to ensure that children remain protected.
A spokesman for the Culture, Media and Sport department said: More needs to be
done to ensure safety measures and tools that prevent children watching post-watershed programmes, such as [parental] locks and Pin protection, are more widely used. We will keep progress under close review and if necessary consider the case for
legislation to ensure that audiences are protected to the level they choose.
|
|
New rules to require state censorship of Internet TV
|
|
|
| 20th
March 2014
|
|
| See article from
hollywoodreporter.com |
New rules will require censorship approval for all streaming video. China's media censor has introduced a policy of censor first, broadcast later for local Internet companies streaming TV shows and movies, which could mean further control over
online distribution of Hollywood content in China. From now on, online companies will have to employ government-approved censors to vet content and obtain a censorship license, then monitor content before it is broadcast, the State Administration of
Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television (SAPPRFT) said in a statement on its website: Service companies broadcasting Internet audio and video programs, such as online dramas and microfilms etc, should have
qualified personnel examining the content, who meet the requirements for checking and have been trained by state or provincial Internet video and audio programs industry associations.
Online companies like Sohu, Youku Tudou and Baidu
have been showing TV shows such as House of Cards and Modern Family after doing their own internal censorship. |
|
Now Netflix are inventing the Netflix-Knows-Best-Money-Grabber's-Cut
|
|
|
|
14th January 2014
|
|
| See article from
pcauthority.com.au by Steven Greaves |
Netflix, Lovefilm and the rest are a bit like the cheap DVD racks at your local supermarket, where you pay $10 for a bare-bones copy of a film. No special features, no director's commentary and no director's cut version. That's a
conscious decision, according to Netflix chief product officer Neil Hunt My guess is that there really isn't a case for different versions of a film, he told us at the company's demo of 4K streaming. The studios should deliver the best version,
and that's what we capture. Our job is to get the director's cut and not bother with all the rest of it; there are very, very few users who are going to care about watching the five different versions and geeking out on it. That's probably not an
audience that it's cost-effective and worthwhile to chase. CUT DOWN Accordingly, for Netflix titles like The Hobbit and Mimic, there's only one version available on the service -- indeed, there's no indication that there are
any other versions available elsewhere. While that's a fair point of view for a company to hold, it does seem a bit short-sighted. ...Read the full
article ...
|
|
|