|
40 Tory MPs set to oppose the Government's Snooper's Charter
|
|
|
| 22nd December 2012
|
|
| See article from
dailymail.co.uk
|
Nasty plans for a snoopers charter' were in turmoil last night after 40 Tory MPs threatened a full-scale revolt. They are demanding major changes to the Communications Bill. The backbenchers say the Bill's scope must be limited to
terrorism and the most serious crimes if Britain is not to be turned into a nation of suspects. Tory MP Dominic Raab has collected the names of 40 colleagues who will sign an open letter opposing the Bill unless it is substantially amended:
- "We urge you to limit the application of the Bill to terrorist offences and the most serious crimes, limit access to such data to the intelligence agencies, SOCA and the police, and make the regime subject to judicial
warrant as a safeguard against abuse."
- "From a law enforcement perspective, there has been no explanation as to how those using foreign internet and communications service providers will be
prevented from circumventing the regime."
- "Equally, given the public sector's woeful track record of protecting personal data, we are concerned about the vulnerability of the scheme to both the
negligence of officials and attempts to infiltrate the system by those with criminal intent. We would urge you to consult in further detail with the Information Commissioner, internet providers, telephone companies and other external experts, to test the
technical integrity of the proposals."
- "Finally, the Home Office estimates the proposals would cost £2 billion. The Committee stated that these estimates 'are not robust'. We urge Ministers to
subject the proposals to external audit and re-consider their law enforcement cost-benefit in light of the suggestions made, above, to limit their breadth and tighten their focus."
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has already demanded the Government return to the drawing board . Now the prospect of a rebellion by both Coalition parties means ministers may have to rely on Labour support. However, the Opposition has yet to
say where it stands on the issue. The 40 MPs are unnamed but Raab said the 40 MPs include 19 first elected in 2010, a group who have proved they will take a stand on issues of importance.
|
|
Office of Fair Trading to investigate personalised pricing by online retailers
|
|
|
| 15th December 2012
|
|
| See article from
standard.co.uk
|
Claims that online shoppers are being charged different prices by companies using software to detect the wealth of its customers are being investigated by the Office of Fair Trading. The watchdog has responded to concerns that shoppers using Apple
Macs or iPads and visiting top end websites might be charged more. There are also growing numbers of anecdotal reports that suggest sophisticated systems are being used to raise prices on websites when they detect that shoppers are emotionally
committed to a purchase. For instance, if someone who is looking at an airline site for flights has already browsed hotel options, it suggests that the search is more than casual. The software analyses the trail of cookies, files
maintained on the browsing computer by website software, reveal precisely where a particular shopper has been searching, giving retailers vital information about their preferences. As well as analysing the cookie trail, the personalised pricing software can work out the type of computer or device being used and its location. Certain devices, eg those made by Apple, are associated with higher spending consumers.
IT expert Tom Cheesewright said: There is currently no hard evidence other than anecdotal that it is happening, but it is certainly technically possible. There are lots of references to it on internet forums and
friends are already clearing cookies so they give nothing away.
Amazon is the only company known to have attempted personalised pricing when it briefly tried it in 2000. It backed down after customers became suspicious.
|
|
|
|
|
| 15th December
2012
|
|
| The new Communications Data Bill continues the trend away from privacy to giving the state full access to our private lives. See
article from spiked-online.com |
|
Credit reference agencies given the job of snooping into people's spending patterns
|
|
|
|
14th December 2012
|
|
| See article from telegraph.co.uk
|
UK Credit reference agencies will implement data mining surveillance on people's spending patterns and then cross check with income declared on tax returns. The agencies will identify high and medium risks of both illegal and legal
tax avoidance and report those people to HM Revenue and Customs. Suspects will then be subject to more detailed tax scrutiny. About two million people are expected to be investigated under the programme. HMRC is already reporting successful
results of a pilot programme involving about 20,000 people which will now be extended nationally. Treasury sources said that hundreds of millions are expected to be raised from the greater use of third-party data, such as that supplied by
credit reference agencies. Many of those who are expected to be identified are likely to be self-employed workers who are suspected of having under-declared their income to the authorities.
|
|
|
|
|
| 13th
December 2012
|
|
| Open Rights Group outlines some the parliamentary criticisms of the Government's Snooper's Charter See
article from openrightsgroup.org |
|
Parliamentary committee sees through the government's bollox and reports on how nasty the Snooper's Charter really is
|
|
|
| 12th December 2012
|
|
| See article from
independent.co.uk
|
Ministers signalled they will rewrite the Snooper's Charter which gives police, security services and anyone else the government nominates new powers to snoop on communications. An influential parliamentary committee branded it overkill and Deputy
Prime Minister Nick Clegg said it needed a fundamental rethink . Home Secretary Theresa May accepted the substance of a highly-critical report by the committee set up to scrutinise the draft version of the Bill, which would allow a
range of official bodies to monitor emails, web phone calls and activity on social networking sites. The committee of MPs and peers said the legislation would give the Home Secretary sweeping powers to issue secret notices ordering
communications companies to disclose potentially limitless categories of data . And they accused the Government of using fanciful and misleading figures to support its case for the legislation. Clegg said he was ready to block the
Bill in its current form, and called on the Home Office to go back to the drawing board : I believe the coalition Government needs to have a fundamental rethink about this legislation. We
cannot proceed with this Bill and we have to go back to the drawing board. We need to reflect properly on the criticisms that the committee have made, while also consulting much more widely with business and other interested groups.
|
|
Reprehensible Microsoft idea to use the Kinect camera to spy on users
|
|
|
|
19th November 2012
|
|
| See article from
extremetech.com
|
Microsoft has filed for a Kinect-related patent that would use the inbuilt camera monitor the number of viewers in a room and check to see if the number of occupants exceeded a certain threshold set by the content provider. If there are too many warm
bodies present, the device owner would be prompted to purchase a license for a greater number of viewers. The patent's various claims can endow a device with a limited number of performances in a given period of time, a limited number of users
allowed to view such performances, and the continuous monitoring of viewers during those performances. It also covers the determination of when performance of the content to an identified user exceeds a threshold.
|
|
|
|
|
| 11th November
2012
|
|
| Oyster, Octopus and Metro cards: what happens to our data? See
article from privacyinternational.org |
|
|
|
|
|
2nd November 2012
|
|
| Theresa May faced tough questions when she appeared before the Joint Committee on the draft Communications Data Bill. See
article from publicaffairs.linx.net |
|
Major internet companies set to oppose the Government's Snooper's Charter
|
|
|
| 14th
October 2012
|
|
| See article from
dailymail.co.uk
|
Google, Facebook and Twitter are set to torpedo reprehensible Home Office plans to spy on every citizen's emails and website visits. The companies have threatened to block the snoopers charter, which requires them to store all data for a
year so that security agencies, police and councils can request its disclosure should they need to investigate internet insults. Civil liberty groups point out that the powers would create a surveillance state, but Britain's security and
intelligence agencies claim they are vital to investigate insulting messages and crimes against political correctness. Parliamentary testimonies of internet bosses have been released by a cross-party committee of MPs and peers that is scrutinising
the draft Communications Data Bill. They reveal directors from Google, Facebook, Yahoo!, Microsoft and Twitter believe the Bill would breach users' privacy and allow repressive regimes to spy on Britons. Facebook said it might go to court to
resist the new law, while Google and Twitter executives said they could refuse to unlock encrypted data if the Government were to seek the information via third-party providers such as BT. Facebook said it might go to court to resist the new law, while
Google and Twitter said they could refuse to unlock encrypted data
|
|
Government to unveil its Identity Assurance Programme
|
|
|
| 12th
October 2012
|
|
| See
article from
independent.co.uk
|
The Government will announce details this month of a controversial national identity scheme which will allow people to use their mobile phones and social media profiles as official identification documents for accessing public services. People
wishing to apply for services ranging from tax credits to fishing licences and passports will be asked to choose from a list of familiar online log-ins, including those they already use on social media sites, banks, and large retailers such as
supermarkets, to prove their identity. Once they have logged in correctly by computer or mobile phone, the site will send a message to the government agency authenticating that user's identity. The Cabinet Office is understood to have held
discussions with the Post Office, high street banks, mobile phone companies and technology giants ranging from Facebook and Microsoft to Google, PayPal and BT. Ministers are anxious that the identity programme is not denounced as a Big Brother
national ID card by the back door, which is why data will not be kept centrally by any government department. Indeed, it is hoped the Identity Assurance Programme, which is being led by the Cabinet Office, will mean the end to any prospect of a
physical national ID card being introduced in the UK. The public will be able to use their log-ins from a set list of well known private organisations to access Government services, which are being grouped together on a single website called
Gov.uk, which will be accessible by mobile. A cross-section of social media companies, high street banks, mobile phone businesses and major retailers has been chosen in order to appeal to as wide a demographic as possible. Major web sites are able
to recognise individuals by their patterns of use, the device they are accessing from and its location. Facebook, for example, asks users who sign on from an unusual location to take a series of security questions including identifying friends in
photographs.
|
|
|
|
|
| 4th
October 2012
|
|
| Social media monitoring becomes next big thing in law enforcement. John Cooper QC said that police are monitoring key activists online and that officers and the courts are becoming increasingly savvy
when it comes to social media See article
from independent.co.uk |
|
|
|
|
| 4th October 2012
|
|
| CCTV cameras, the spies in our midst. By John Kampfner See article from
dailymail.co.uk |
|
Warning that PC rental companies use intrusive surveillance to keep tabs on customers
|
|
|
| 3rd October
2012
|
|
| See article from bbc.com
|
Rented computers from seven different companies secretly took photographs of their users, US authorities have said. The companies used software made by US company Designerware which enables the tracking of key strokes and personal data. The
software, called PC Rental Agent, captured people engaging in intimate acts , including sex. Webcam pictures of children, partially undressed individuals, and intimate activities at home were found. A court settlement means the companies
are banned from using the software which invaded the users' privacy. However, some software - such as location tracking - could still be used as long as the companies involved made it explicitly clear to the users. It is believed that PC Rental
Agent has been installed in approximately 420,000 computers worldwide. The Federal Trade Commission ruling concerned a feature in the software, called Detective Mode, which is intended to be activated if the user was late in returning equipment,
or failed to pay for use. Detective Mode would assist the rental store in locating the overdue computer in order to pursue its return. Part of the technique included a pop-up window designed to look like a software registration screen. It would
request personal information such as email addresses and telephone numbers. In addition, the FTC said the software had access to much more sensitive information, including: usernames and passwords for email accounts, social media websites, and financial
institutions. Among the other data collected were social security numbers; medical records; private emails to doctors; bank and credit card statements.
|
|
|