Laws around the making and sharing of non-consensual intimate images are to be reviewed under plans to ensure protections keep pace with emerging technology.
Justice Minister Paul Maynard and Digital Secretary Jeremy Wright have
asked the Law Commission to examine whether current legislation is fit to tackle new and evolving types of abusive and offensive communications, including image-based abuse, amid concerns it has become easier to create and distribute sexual images of
people online without their permission.
The review, which will be launched shortly, will consider a range of disturbing digital trends such as 'cyber-flashing' -- when people receive unsolicited sexual images of someone over the
phone -- and 'deepfake' pornography -- the degrading practice of superimposing an individual's face onto pornographic photos or videos without consent.
The move builds on government action in recent years to better protect victims
and bring more offenders to justice, including making 'upskirting' and 'revenge porn' specific criminal offences.
The review will also consider the case for granting automatic anonymity to revenge porn victims, so they cannot be
named publicly, as is the case for victims of sexual offences.
Tackling sexual offences is a priority for this government, and in many cases this behaviour will already be caught by a number of existing offences such as
'voyeurism' under the Sexual Offences Act 2003.
However, ministers are committed to ensuring the right protections are in place for the modern age, and alongside the review, a public consultation will be launched on strengthening
the law -- seeking views from victims, groups representing them, law enforcement, academics and anyone else with an interest in the issue.
This review is part of joint work between the Ministry of Justice and Department for
Digital Culture, Media and Sport and Government Equalities Office to consider reform of communications offences, examining the glorification of violent crime and the encouragement of self-harm online, and whether co-ordinated harassment by groups of
people online could be more effectively addressed by the criminal law.