Complaints about divisive racism oust the usual complaints about gay propaganda for children
||7th April 2021 |
See article from ala.org
Previous editions of the American Library Association list have been dominated by complaints about books attempting to normalise gay or transgender relationships to children. This year marks a dramatic change and now most books have received
complaints about racism issues and about divisive racial politics.
Top 10 Most Challenged Books of 2020
The American Library Association Office for Intellectual Freedom tracked 156 challenges to library,
school, and university materials and services in 2020. Of the 273 books that were targeted, here are the most challenged, along with the reasons cited for censoring the books:
George by Alex Gino
Reasons: Challenged, banned, and restricted for LGBTQIA+ content, conflicting with a religious viewpoint, and not reflecting "the values of our community"
Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You by Ibram X. Kendi and Jason Reynolds
Reasons: Banned and challenged because of author's public statements, and because of claims that the book contains "selective
storytelling incidents" and does not encompass racism against all people
All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely
Reasons: Banned and challenged for profanity, drug use, and alcoholism, and
because it was thought to promote anti-police views, contain divisive topics, and be "too much of a sensitive matter right now"
Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson
Reasons: Banned, challenged, and
restricted because it was thought to contain a political viewpoint and it was claimed to be biased against male students, and for the novel's inclusion of rape and profanity
The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian
by Sherman Alexie
Reasons: Banned and challenged for profanity, sexual references, and allegations of sexual misconduct by the author
Something Happened in Our Town: A Child's Story About Racial Injustice by
Marianne Celano, Marietta Collins, and Ann Hazzard, illustrated by Jennifer Zivoin
Reasons: Challenged for "divisive language" and because it was thought to promote anti-police views
To Kill a
Mockingbird by Harper Lee
Reasons: Banned and challenged for racial slurs and their negative effect on students, featuring a "white savior" character, and its perception of the Black experience
Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
Reasons: Banned and challenged for racial slurs and racist stereotypes, and their negative effect on students
The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison
Reasons: Banned and
challenged because it was considered sexually explicit and depicts child sexual abuse
The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas
Reasons: Challenged for profanity, and it was thought to promote an anti-police message
Captain Underpants author withdraws graphic novel after claims of racism
|29th March 2021 |
See article from theguardian.com
Captain Underpants author Dav Pilkey has apologised for suuposed harmful racial stereotypes and passively racist imagery in one of his graphic novels for children, which has now been withdrawn by his publisher.
The Adventures of Ook and Gluk:
Kung-Fu Cavemen from the Future , first published in 2010, follows two cavemen who travel to the year 2222 and meet Master Wong, a martial arts instructor.
The book's publisher Scholastic announced that it would stop distributing the book and
remove all mention of it from its website. Scholastic said:
Together, we recognise that this book perpetuates passive racism. We are deeply sorry for this serious mistake.
In a letter, Pilkey
But this week it was brought to my attention that this book also contains harmful racial stereotypes and passively racist imagery. I wanted to take this opportunity to publicly apologise for this. It was
and is wrong and harmful to my Asian readers, friends, and family, and to all Asian people.
I hope that you, my readers, will forgive me, and learn from my mistake that even unintentional and passive
stereotypes and racism are harmful to everyone. I apologise, and I pledge to do better.
Oxford English Dictionary continues to include factual usage definitions such as 'bitch' and 'bint' that offend woke sensibilities
See article from telegraph.co.uk
One of the recent targets of the cancel culture lynch mobs is to ban derogatory terms for women from dictionaries.
However Oxford University Press [OUP], publishers of the Oxford English Dictionary have said that terms such as bint and bitch, will
remain in the Oxford Dictionary of English because to remove them would amount to censorship. Speaking at an event to mark International Women's Day, Katherine Martin, head of product for Oxford Languages,said:
is quite a common word in English. Part of what we do as lexicographers is to show the full range of meanings that it has.
To not show any aspect of a word's use would be akin to censorship. Lexicographers want to make facts
available to the public, and the more synonyms and information [a word] has, the better.
Eleanor Maier, OUP's executive editor, said context was all-important:
As dictionary makers, we have a
responsibility to accurately describe how language is used and that means we should include sexist and racist terms. But it's really important for us to contextualise them. So if a term is derogatory or highly offensive, we should say it.
Estate of Dr Suess estate cancels six books over ludicrous logic that would make the Cat n the Hat proud
|5th March 2021 |
See article from cnbc.com
Books by Dr. Seuss have flooded Amazon's U.S. bestseller list after it was announced that six of the author's publications were being cancelled over ludicrous woke claims of racist imagery.
The Cat in the Hat is currently the bestselling
book on Amazon's U.S. store, closely followed by One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish and Green Eggs and Ham , along with several other titles by the late Theodor Seuss Geisel. In total, 15 Dr. Seuss publications were in Amazon's top 20
list on Friday morning. This comes after Dr. Seuss Enterprises, the business running the late author's estate, said Tuesday it has cancelled publication and licensing of six of his books:
- And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street
- If I Ran the Zoo
- McElligot's Pool
- On Beyond Zebra!
- Scrambled Eggs Super!
- The Cat's Quizzer.
Dr. Seuss Enterprises claimed in a statement that these books portray people in ways that are hurtful and wrong. Chief of Woke Staff Joe Biden notably left any mention of Dr. Seuss out of his Read Across America Day proclamation on Monday. Former
Presidents Donald Trump and Barack Obama both mentioned Dr. Seuss in their previous speeches.
Comment: Why the cancellation of Dr Seuss matters
5th March 2021. See article from spiked-online.com
example of the ludicrous claims about racism in Dr Suess:
As it happens, until recently Dr Seuss books have had a reputation for encouraging tolerance. The Sneetches and Other Stories , in particular, has been praised for
its messages about overcoming differences. But today's anti-racist campaigners find even the Sneetches problematic. According to Learning for Justice , an 'education' advisory group:
As a result, they accept one
another. This message of "acceptance" does not acknowledge structural power imbalances. It doesn't address the idea that historical narratives impact present-day power structures. And instead of encouraging young readers to recognise and take
action against injustice, the story promotes a race-neutral approach.'
You read that right. The Sneetches are apparently racist because they look at the world in a race-neutral way, and because they learn to accept