Melon Farmers Original Version

Internet News


Latest

 2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   Latest 

 

Prime censorship...

Ofcom lines up its next ignorable age verification fines


Link Here 2nd October 2026
Full story: Online Safety Act...UK Government legislates to censor social media
Update on existing investigations: Provisional Decisions

Web Prime Inc

On 29 September 2026, we issued a provisional notice of contravention to Web Prime Inc as the provider of:
  • anysex.com
  • fapality.com
  • mylust.com
  • xcafe.com
  • yourlust.com

This notice sets out our provisional view that we have reasonable grounds to believe that Web Prime has failed to comply with its duty to use highly effective ID/age assurance. We have also provisionally found that Web Prime has failed, and is failing, to comply with its duties  to respond to a statutory request for information.

The websites are currently self blocked to readers with a UK IP address but may be accessed using a VPN.

 

The provider of porntrex.com

Ofcom came to the same conclusion about the website porntrex.com. Again this website is currently self blocked to readers with a UK IP address but may be accessed using a VPN.

 

First Time Videos LLC -- case closure

Ofcom closed its investigation into First Time Videos LLC in relation to its failure to implement adequate ID/age verification. Ofcom had imposed a penalty on First Time Videos of £80,000.

In response to our investigation, First Time Videos LLC has implemented a block to restrict users with UK IP addresses from accessing its service and has advised Ofcom that it will put highly effective age assurance in place on its services. For the moment the FTV websites still give the impression that they are available after paying with a debit card or credit card.

First Time Videos LLC has paid the penalty set out in the Confirmation Decision. This investigation is now closed.

 

 

Whatever steps are taken, its never enough for campaigners and censors...

Pornhub contends that ID/age verification needs to done once per device whilst Ofcom contends that it should be re-done frequently


Link Here 2nd October 2026
Full story: Online Safety Act...UK Government legislates to censor social media

Ofcom launches investigation into Pornhub's age checks

Ofcom has opened an investigation into Aylo -- the service provider of Pornhub -- under the UK's Online Safety Act, to determine whether it has complied with its duties to prevent children from encountering pornographic content.

In May 2026, Pornhub deployed a new age assurance process for some users. This process relies on signals from a third party, in this case Apple, that suggest UK users trying to access Pornhub may have completed Apple's age checks.

The Online Safety Act is clear that it is the service provider's responsibility to ensure that any age assurance process is highly effective -- no matter at what stage an age check occurs.

Providers must also carry out a suitable and sufficient assessment of whether their service is likely to be accessed by children. They must do this before making any significant change to the design or operation of their service, or in response to evidence about reduced effectiveness of age checks.

We are concerned that Aylo may not have conducted sufficient due diligence and testing before implementing its new age assurance process. As a result, we are concerned that Aylo's process may not be highly effective at preventing children from seeing pornography.

Ofcom has decided to open a formal investigation to establish whether Aylo has failed to comply with legal obligations under the Online Safety Act, in particular to:

  • use highly effective age assurance to prevent children from seeing pornography; and complete a suitable and sufficient children's access assessment.

  • As part of our investigation we will consider how Aylo implemented its age assurance process, and whether it conducted the necessary due diligence before deployment. Our investigation will not make a determination on how Apple operates its age checks.

 

In response to Ofcom's announcement

See article from aylo.com Statement by Alex Kekesi, VP Brand and Community, on behalf of Aylo

Four months following our successful launch of age verification on Pornhub for eligible adult users in the United Kingdom (UK) who have confirmed their age through Apple's UK age-verification process, Ofcom informed us that they were launching an investigation into our use of Apple's age assurance in the United Kingdom. We are committed to working constructively with Ofcom and Apple in our shared commitment to child protection.

We trust that the investigation will show Apple's UK device-level age-verification update, which renders devices operating since iOS26.4 kid safe by default, offers one of the strongest and hardest to circumvent protections currently available for helping prevent minors from accessing age-inappropriate content.

In March 2026, Apple demonstrated its commitment to child safety by becoming the first operating system developer to automatically enable adult content website filtering, effectively making adult content websites inaccessible to unverified or minor UK-based Apple iOS and iPadOS users. This update was welcomed with a public statement by Ofcom, in which it praised Apple's decision that the UK be one of the first countries in the world to receive new child safety protections on devices [as] a real win for children and families206Our rules are flexible and designed to encourage innovation, particularly in age assurance. We've worked closely with Apple and other services to ensure they can be applied in a variety of contexts in order to ensure users are protected.

In June, the UK government announced its expectation that all operating system manufacturers should follow this same standard. In September, the UK government further announced it would introduce legislation requiring these device level controls and for them to be enabled by default, reinforcing the strength and importance of Apple's implementation, making this a highly effective age assurance method.

Ofcom's own July 2026 report identifies the fundamental gap: age assurance is effective on individual services when properly implemented, but not yet at an overall system level, due to user migration to non-age assured sites. It recognizes that protection of children requires a system-wide effort, expressly identifying operating systems as having a potential role in strengthening protections. This is why we support Apple's device-level approach: protecting children should not depend on every website they visit choosing to follow the rules.

Given Aylo's well-documented commitment to compliance and to the effective protection of minors, we continue to believe that Apple's implementation presents an opportunity for constructive collaboration and for the UK to establish a meaningful precedent in advancing effective, privacy-preserving online safety. Having experimented in multiple markets with multiple methods of age assurance including in the UK, Aylo believes that Apple's implementation is a pioneering approach for child safety that provides significantly stronger protection than any other age assurance method currently available in the UK market.

As outlined by Lucy Faithfull Foundation, we know that when faced with age verification, some adults are choosing riskier, irresponsible sites to avoid age checks. According to the Free Speech Coalition less than 5% of consumers actually go through with age-verification for adult content. When confronted with a request for a facial scan and government ID, most consumers simply hit the back button and find a non-compliant site outside the mandate or log on to a VPN. The internet is global and it's impossible to patrol millions of different sites based in hundreds of different countries. Site-based regulation is always going to encourage evasion.

The UK government's recent announcements acknowledge this, as does Apple's own announcement that it will deploy the same implementation in Australia. Aylo is prepared to provide the technical evidence, testing and supporting assessments on which that position is based.

Aylo will cooperate fully with the investigation and looks forward to engaging with the case team.

 

 

Violent blocks...

Ofcom updates progress on censoring 'small but risky' websites


Link Here 30th August 2026

UK internet censor Ofcom has provided a statement outlining progress in blocking 14 unnamed websites that it classes as 'small but risky' services. 7 have self blocked all UK users, 2 have introduced ID/age verification, 3 have refused to communicate. Ofcom writes:

Ofcom's Small but Risky Services Compliance Taskforce is a dedicated team focused on identifying and driving compliance from regulated services with small userbases that pose a disproportionate risk of serious harm to UK users.

On 24 July 2025, Ofcom launched an enforcement programme focussing on services whose principal purpose is the hosting or dissemination of Primary Priority Content or Priority Content, to ensure such services used highly effective age assurance to prevent children from accessing the service. Since then, the Compliance Taskforce has monitored and carried out active engagement with providers of 14 services that represent a significant risk of harm to children from the harmful content they host or disseminate. Today we are providing an update on progress.

Geo-blocks implemented:

Following proactive engagement by the Compliance Taskforce, seven of the identified services, each of which were dedicated to hosting particularly harmful types of content - including suicide and self-harm content, violent and graphic content, and eating disorder content - have geo-blocked the UK and are no longer accessible to UK users (including children) as at the date of this update. This includes five services dedicated to hosting graphic violence and serious injury content, and two dedicated to hosting suicide content.

Warning letters:

Providers of three identified services who failed to engage have been sent warning letters from Ofcoms Enforcement team. These notify them of their requirements under Section 12 of the Act to prevent and protect children from encountering content which is harmful to them on their service, including through the use of highly effective age assurance. We continue to assess whether additional action is required and will take into account their response in considering our options.

Highly effective age assurance implemented:

Two high profile services identified by the Compliance Taskforce, dedicated to hosting graphic violence and serious injury content, have implemented highly effective age assurance to prevent access by UK children following engagement.

Next steps:

The work under this enforcement programme has been coordinated across Ofcoms Supervision and Enforcement teams. It has so far demonstrated that seeking voluntary engagement from services is often the most rapid way to protect users. Particularly in cases involving smaller services that may not have a wide reach but that represent a significant risk of harm by hosting or promoting content that is particularly harmful to children.

We have made good progress with the majority of services we have engaged with so far. Going forward, we will continue to prioritise active engagement with services that pose the highest risk of harm to children.

Where service providers do not engage or fail to comply with their duties under the Act, including those in Section 12, we will not hesitate to move to formal enforcement action.

We will provide further updates on the work of the Compliance Taskforce in due course.

 

 

Commented: Mega Meta fine...

Meta must pay another $567 million as Facebook and Instagram are judged to be harmful to New Mexico children


Link Here 28th August 2026
Full story: Age Verification in USA...Requiring age verification for porn and social media
US Chief District Court Judge Bryan Biedscheid ordered Meta to pay $567 million into a New Mexico abatement fund. He refused to overtly order age verification across Facebook and Instagram. But then he ordered a narrower version of it, aimed at the accounts Meta's own systems predict belong to children under 13, which would ultimately lead to age verification anyway.

New Mexico Attorney General Raoul Torrez sued Meta and Mark Zuckerberg in 2023, alleging that the company failed to protect children from abuse, online solicitation and human trafficking. This legal action was addressed in two trials:

A Santa Fe jury in March found 75,000 violations of the state's Unfair Practices Act and imposed $375 million in civil penalties , the maximum state law allows. The jury determined that the company knowingly harmed children's mental health and concealed what it knew about child sexual exploitation on its platforms.

Now a second, bench asked whether the platforms are a public nuisance, and Biedscheid concluded that they are a significant contributing cause of the teen mental health crisis in New Mexico.

Torrez had asked the court to require Meta to apply various age-verification tools on its platforms , accurate to 99%, enough to keep under-13s off the apps entirely.

Because of the COPPA Rule, it is the Court's conclusion that it cannot order Meta to request children to submit personal data or be passively tracked online, even for age-verification purposes, Biedscheid wrote. But how would Meta know that an account belongs to someone under 13 without at the very least passively tracking them, what they write, say, and do?

What Biedscheid did order on age came from Meta. He adopted the company's own proposed relief, calling it far from ideal or sufficient and, all the same, most appropriate. Meta must keep improving its age assurance models in New Mexico using AI tools, and must attempt within two years to build a dedicated under-13-years-of-age prediction model. Where it cannot estimate a precise age, it must treat the user as under 13 or under 18 until they verify. And verify here likely means adults have to show ID to speak online, even though Judge Biedscheid said he wasn't mandating that.

Meta must also delete the personal information it has already collected on under-13s, and build a portal with schools or a child safety organization for flagging suspected underage accounts.

The money will be paid over five years, with $420 million of it going to treatment and the rest to awareness, prevention, screening, referral and evaluation. It comes on top of the March penalties.

 

Comment: The Meta Settlement: What It Means for Your Speech and Privacy

Under the teen safety provisions is a court-supervised identity system for every Facebook and Instagram user.

See article from reclaimthenet.org


 2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   Latest 


 


 
TV  

Movies

Games

Internet
 
Advertising

Technology

Gambling

Food+Drink
Books

Music

Art

Stage

melonfarmers icon

Home

Top

Index

Links

Search
 

UK

World

Media

Liberty

Info
 

Film Index

Film Cuts

Film Shop

Sex News

Sex Sells
 


Adult Store Reviews

Adult DVD & VoD

Adult Online Stores

New Releases/Offers

Latest Reviews

FAQ: Porn Legality
 

Sex Shops List

Lap Dancing List

Satellite X List

Sex Machines List

John Thomas Toys